Product comparison · 2 usb graphics adapters

Nanocable 10.16.4102 USB graphics adapter vs Nanocable 10.16.4104 USB graphics adapter

Add a product
  • 17specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 11identical
  • 5known for one product only

Key differences

  • HDMI output
    • 10.16.4102 USB graphics adapter:Yes
    • 10.16.4104 USB graphics adapter:No
  • DisplayPort output
    • 10.16.4102 USB graphics adapter:No
    • 10.16.4104 USB graphics adapter:Yes
  • Maximum resolution
    • 10.16.4102 USB graphics adapter:4096 x 2160 pixels
    • 10.16.4104 USB graphics adapter:3840 x 2160 pixels
  • Refresh rate at maximum resolution
    • 10.16.4102 USB graphics adapter:30 Hz
    • 10.16.4104 USB graphics adapter:60 Hz
  • Product colour
    • 10.16.4102 USB graphics adapter:White
    • 10.16.4104 USB graphics adapter:Aluminium
  • Package weight
    • 10.16.4102 USB graphics adapter:29 g
    • 10.16.4104 USB graphics adapter:38 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 10.16.4102, 10.16.4104
22 specifications
Performance4 differ
USB connector form factorKnown for oneStraightUnknown — not stated by the source
HDMI outputDiffersYesNo
DisplayPort outputDiffersNoYes
Maximum resolutionDiffers4096 x 2160 pixels3840 x 2160 pixels
Refresh rate at maximum resolutionDiffers30 Hz60 Hz
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersWhiteAluminium
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one45 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one45 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one16 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data1 differ
Package typeKnown for onePolybagUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightDiffers29 g38 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More usb graphics adapter comparisons

All usb graphics adapter comparisons