Product comparison · 2 usb graphics adapters

Microconnect USB3.1CVGAW USB graphics adapter White vs Samsung EE-PW700 USB graphics adapter White

2specifications compared
1differ
1identical
10known for one product only

Key differences

Weight
- USB3.1CVGAW USB graphics adapter White:38 g
- EE-PW700 USB graphics adapter White:54.9 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of USB3.1CVGAW, EE-PW700
12 specifications	A Microconnect USB3.1CVGAW USB graphics adapter White Model USB3.1CVGAW View product	B Samsung EE-PW700 USB graphics adapter White Model EE-PW700 View product
Designidentical
Product colour	White	White
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	38 g	54.9 g
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	62.2 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	11.6 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	240 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	198 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	177 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	16 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	38 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Cable lengthKnown for one	0.2 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Connector 1 genderKnown for one	Male	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More usb graphics adapter comparisons

All usb graphics adapter comparisons