Product comparison · 2 usb graphics adapters

Microconnect USB3.1CCOM4 USB graphics adapter vs Microconnect USB3.1CVGAW USB graphics adapter White

Key differences

Weight
- USB3.1CCOM4 USB graphics adapter:90 g
- USB3.1CVGAW USB graphics adapter White:38 g
Package width
- USB3.1CCOM4 USB graphics adapter:279 mm
- USB3.1CVGAW USB graphics adapter White:198 mm
Package depth
- USB3.1CCOM4 USB graphics adapter:179 mm
- USB3.1CVGAW USB graphics adapter White:177 mm
Package height
- USB3.1CCOM4 USB graphics adapter:18 mm
- USB3.1CVGAW USB graphics adapter White:16 mm
Package weight
- USB3.1CCOM4 USB graphics adapter:100 g
- USB3.1CVGAW USB graphics adapter White:38 g

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of USB3.1CCOM4, USB3.1CVGAW
11 specifications	A Microconnect USB3.1CCOM4 USB graphics adapter Model USB3.1CCOM4 View product	B Microconnect USB3.1CVGAW USB graphics adapter White Model USB3.1CVGAW View product
Performanceidentical
Maximum resolutionKnown for one	1920 x 1080 pixels	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colour	White	White
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	90 g	38 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	279 mm	198 mm
Package depthDiffers	179 mm	177 mm
Package heightDiffers	18 mm	16 mm
Package weightDiffers	100 g	38 g
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one	1 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	84733020	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Cable lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.2 m
Connector 1 genderKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Male

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.