Product comparison · 2 usb graphics adapters

Microconnect USB3.1CCOM4 USB graphics adapter vs Microconnect USB3.1CHDMI-S USB graphics adapter Black

Key differences

Product colour
- USB3.1CCOM4 USB graphics adapter:White
- USB3.1CHDMI-S USB graphics adapter Black:Black
Weight
- USB3.1CCOM4 USB graphics adapter:90 g
- USB3.1CHDMI-S USB graphics adapter Black:16 g
Package depth
- USB3.1CCOM4 USB graphics adapter:179 mm
- USB3.1CHDMI-S USB graphics adapter Black:162 mm
Package height
- USB3.1CCOM4 USB graphics adapter:18 mm
- USB3.1CHDMI-S USB graphics adapter Black:16 mm
Package weight
- USB3.1CCOM4 USB graphics adapter:100 g
- USB3.1CHDMI-S USB graphics adapter Black:26 g

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of USB3.1CCOM4, USB3.1CHDMI-S
11 specifications	A Microconnect USB3.1CCOM4 USB graphics adapter Model USB3.1CCOM4 View product	B Microconnect USB3.1CHDMI-S USB graphics adapter Black Model USB3.1CHDMI-S View product
Performanceidentical
Maximum resolutionKnown for one	1920 x 1080 pixels	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	White	Black
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	90 g	16 g
Packaging data3 differ
Package width	279 mm	279 mm
Package depthDiffers	179 mm	162 mm
Package heightDiffers	18 mm	16 mm
Package weightDiffers	100 g	26 g
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one	1 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	84733020	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Cable lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.15 m
Connector 1 genderKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Male

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.