All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 usb graphics adapters

Microconnect USB3.1CCOM10 USB graphics adapter vs Microconnect USB3.1CCOM4 USB graphics adapter

Add a product
  • 8specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 1identical
  • 6known for one product only

Key differences

  • Maximum resolution
    • 3840 x 2160 pixels
    • 1920 x 1080 pixels
  • Product colour
    • Black
    • White
  • Weight
    • 30 g
    • 90 g
  • Package width
    • 278 mm
    • 279 mm
  • Package depth
    • 160 mm
    • 179 mm
  • Package height
    • 17 mm
    • 18 mm
  • Package weight
    • 84 g
    • 100 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
14 specifications
A

Microconnect

USB3.1CCOM10 USB graphics adapter

Model USB3.1CCOM10

View product
B

Microconnect

USB3.1CCOM4 USB graphics adapter

Model USB3.1CCOM4

View product
Performance1 differ
DisplayPorts quantityKnown for one1
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one1
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one1
DisplayPort versionKnown for one1.2
Maximum resolutionDiffers3840 x 2160 pixels1920 x 1080 pixels
Supported video modesKnown for one1080p, 2160p
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackWhite
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers30 g90 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers278 mm279 mm
Package depthDiffers160 mm179 mm
Package heightDiffers17 mm18 mm
Package weightDiffers84 g100 g
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More usb graphics adapter comparisons

All usb graphics adapter comparisons