Product comparison · 2 usb graphics adapters

Microconnect USB3.1CCMF-MAGNETIC USB graphics adapter Black vs Nanocable 10.16.4101-G USB graphics adapter

8specifications compared
8differ
0identical
20known for one product only

Key differences

The Microconnect USB3.1CCMF-MAGNETIC USB graphics adapter Black has 117 mm more width than the Nanocable 10.16.4101-G USB graphics adapter (159 mm vs 42 mm). The Microconnect USB3.1CCMF-MAGNETIC USB graphics adapter Black has 76 mm more depth than the Nanocable 10.16.4101-G USB graphics adapter (121 mm vs 45 mm). The Nanocable 10.16.4101-G USB graphics adapter has 5 mm more height than the Microconnect USB3.1CCMF-MAGNETIC USB graphics adapter Black (14 mm vs 9 mm). Product colour: Black on the Microconnect USB3.1CCMF-MAGNETIC USB graphics adapter Black, Grey on the Nanocable 10.16.4101-G USB graphics adapter.

Product colour
- USB3.1CCMF-MAGNETIC USB graphics adapter Black:Black
- 10.16.4101-G USB graphics adapter:Grey
Width
- USB3.1CCMF-MAGNETIC USB graphics adapter Black:159 mm
- 10.16.4101-G USB graphics adapter:42 mm
Depth
- USB3.1CCMF-MAGNETIC USB graphics adapter Black:121 mm
- 10.16.4101-G USB graphics adapter:45 mm
Height
- USB3.1CCMF-MAGNETIC USB graphics adapter Black:9 mm
- 10.16.4101-G USB graphics adapter:14 mm
Package width
- USB3.1CCMF-MAGNETIC USB graphics adapter Black:159 mm
- 10.16.4101-G USB graphics adapter:180 mm
Package depth
- USB3.1CCMF-MAGNETIC USB graphics adapter Black:121 mm
- 10.16.4101-G USB graphics adapter:15 mm
Package height
- USB3.1CCMF-MAGNETIC USB graphics adapter Black:9 mm
- 10.16.4101-G USB graphics adapter:210 mm
Package weight
- USB3.1CCMF-MAGNETIC USB graphics adapter Black:10 g
- 10.16.4101-G USB graphics adapter:35 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of USB3.1CCMF-MAGNETIC, 10.16.4101-G
28 specifications	A Microconnect USB3.1CCMF-MAGNETIC USB graphics adapter Black Model USB3.1CCMF-MAGNETIC View product	B Nanocable 10.16.4101-G USB graphics adapter Model 10.16.4101-G View product
Performanceidentical
USB versionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
USB connector typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB Type-C
USB connector genderKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Male
USB connector form factorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Straight
DVI outputKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
HDMI outputKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
DisplayPort outputKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Number of displays supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Maximum resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1920 x 1200 pixels
Refresh rate at maximum resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	60 Hz
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Black	Grey
Housing materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Aluminium
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	159 mm	42 mm
DepthDiffers	121 mm	45 mm
HeightDiffers	9 mm	14 mm
USB cable lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.1 m
WeightKnown for one	8 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data4 differ
Package typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Polybag
Package widthDiffers	159 mm	180 mm
Package depthDiffers	121 mm	15 mm
Package heightDiffers	9 mm	210 mm
Package weightDiffers	10 g	35 g
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	RoHS
Cable lengthKnown for one	0 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Connector 1 form factorKnown for one	Angled	Unknown — not stated by the source
Connector 1 genderKnown for one	Male	Unknown — not stated by the source
Connector 2 form factorKnown for one	Straight	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More usb graphics adapter comparisons

All usb graphics adapter comparisons