Product comparison · 2 usb graphics adapters

Microconnect USB3.0VGA USB graphics adapter vs Microconnect USB3.1CCOM3 USB graphics adapter White

Key differences

Product colour
- USB3.0VGA USB graphics adapter:Black
- USB3.1CCOM3 USB graphics adapter White:White
Weight
- USB3.0VGA USB graphics adapter:34 g
- USB3.1CCOM3 USB graphics adapter White:30 g
Package width
- USB3.0VGA USB graphics adapter:158 mm
- USB3.1CCOM3 USB graphics adapter White:199 mm
Package depth
- USB3.0VGA USB graphics adapter:120 mm
- USB3.1CCOM3 USB graphics adapter White:179 mm
Package height
- USB3.0VGA USB graphics adapter:21 mm
- USB3.1CCOM3 USB graphics adapter White:20 mm

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of USB3.0VGA, USB3.1CCOM3
14 specifications	A Microconnect USB3.0VGA USB graphics adapter Model USB3.0VGA View product	B Microconnect USB3.1CCOM3 USB graphics adapter White Model USB3.1CCOM3 View product
Performanceidentical
Maximum resolutionKnown for one	1920 x 1080 pixels	Unknown — not stated by the source
ChipsetKnown for one	FL2000	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Black	White
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Windows 7	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	34 g	30 g
Packaging data3 differ
Package widthDiffers	158 mm	199 mm
Package depthDiffers	120 mm	179 mm
Package heightDiffers	21 mm	20 mm
Package weight	50 g	50 g
Technical detailsidentical
Cable lengthKnown for one	0.15 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Connector 1 form factorKnown for one	Straight	Unknown — not stated by the source
Connector 1 genderKnown for one	Male	Unknown — not stated by the source
Connector 2 form factorKnown for one	Straight	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	84733020

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.