Product comparison · 2 usb graphics adapters

Lindy USB Type C to DisplayPort 4K144 Converter vs Nanocable 10.16.4102-BK USB graphics adapter

Add a product
  • 18specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 8identical
  • 17known for one product only

Key differences

The Nanocable 10.16.4102-BK USB graphics adapter has 256 x 2160 pixels more maximum resolution than the Lindy USB Type C to DisplayPort 4K144 Converter (4096 x 2160 pixels vs 3840 x 2160 pixels). The Lindy USB Type C to DisplayPort 4K144 Converter has 114 Hz more refresh rate at maximum resolution than the Nanocable 10.16.4102-BK USB graphics adapter (144 Hz vs 30 Hz). The Nanocable 10.16.4102-BK USB graphics adapter has 1 mm more height than the Lindy USB Type C to DisplayPort 4K144 Converter (16 mm vs 15 mm). Only the Nanocable 10.16.4102-BK USB graphics adapter has HDMI output. Only the Lindy USB Type C to DisplayPort 4K144 Converter has DisplayPort output.

  • HDMI output
    • USB Type C to DisplayPort 4K144 Converter:No
    • 10.16.4102-BK USB graphics adapter:Yes
  • DisplayPort output
    • USB Type C to DisplayPort 4K144 Converter:Yes
    • 10.16.4102-BK USB graphics adapter:No
  • Maximum resolution
    • USB Type C to DisplayPort 4K144 Converter:3840 x 2160 pixels
    • 10.16.4102-BK USB graphics adapter:4096 x 2160 pixels
  • Refresh rate at maximum resolution
    • USB Type C to DisplayPort 4K144 Converter:144 Hz
    • 10.16.4102-BK USB graphics adapter:30 Hz
  • Height
    • USB Type C to DisplayPort 4K144 Converter:15 mm
    • 10.16.4102-BK USB graphics adapter:16 mm
  • USB cable length
    • USB Type C to DisplayPort 4K144 Converter:0.21 m
    • 10.16.4102-BK USB graphics adapter:0.15 m
  • Package width
    • USB Type C to DisplayPort 4K144 Converter:174 mm
    • 10.16.4102-BK USB graphics adapter:180 mm
  • Package depth
    • USB Type C to DisplayPort 4K144 Converter:194 mm
    • 10.16.4102-BK USB graphics adapter:16 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 43269, 10.16.4102-BK
35 specifications
Performance4 differ
HDMI outputDiffersNoYes
DisplayPort outputDiffersYesNo
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
HDCP versionKnown for one2.2Unknown — not stated by the source
DisplayPort versionKnown for one1.4Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum resolutionDiffers3840 x 2160 pixels4096 x 2160 pixels
Refresh rate at maximum resolutionDiffers144 Hz30 Hz
Supported graphics resolutionsKnown for one3840 x 2160Unknown — not stated by the source
ChipsetKnown for oneLT87101CDUnknown — not stated by the source
Data transfer rate (max)Known for one32.4 Gbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for oneCE, FCC, RoHS, REACH, CP65Unknown — not stated by the source
USB versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
HDMI ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
HDCPKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Designidentical
Housing materialKnown for oneAcrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), PlasticUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
HeightDiffers15 mm16 mm
WeightKnown for one30 gUnknown — not stated by the source
USB cable lengthDiffers0.21 m0.15 m
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 40 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-40 - 80 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 85%Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data3 differ
Package widthDiffers174 mm180 mm
Package depthDiffers194 mm16 mm
Package weightDiffers39 g30 g
Package typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePolybag
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source135 mm
Technical details1 differ
Compliance certificatesDiffersCE, RoHS, REACHRoHS

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More usb graphics adapter comparisons

All usb graphics adapter comparisons