Product comparison · 2 usb graphics adapters

i-tec USB-C Dual 4K/60Hz (single 8K/30Hz) DP Video Adapter vs Trust 26221 USB graphics adapter Silver

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 2identical
  • 18known for one product only

Key differences

The i-tec USB-C Dual 4K/60Hz (single 8K/30Hz) DP Video Adapter has 55 mm more width than the Trust 26221 USB graphics adapter Silver (70 mm vs 15 mm). The i-tec USB-C Dual 4K/60Hz (single 8K/30Hz) DP Video Adapter has 52 mm more depth than the Trust 26221 USB graphics adapter Silver (60 mm vs 8 mm). The Trust 26221 USB graphics adapter Silver has 17 mm more height than the i-tec USB-C Dual 4K/60Hz (single 8K/30Hz) DP Video Adapter (32 mm vs 15 mm). Only the i-tec USB-C Dual 4K/60Hz (single 8K/30Hz) DP Video Adapter has DisplayPort output. USB connector type: USB Type-C on the i-tec USB-C Dual 4K/60Hz (single 8K/30Hz) DP Video Adapter, USB Type-A, USB Type-C on the Trust 26221 USB graphics adapter Silver.

  • USB connector type
    • USB-C Dual 4K/60Hz (single 8K/30Hz) DP Video Adapter:USB Type-C
    • 26221 USB graphics adapter Silver:USB Type-A, USB Type-C
  • DisplayPort output
    • USB-C Dual 4K/60Hz (single 8K/30Hz) DP Video Adapter:Yes
    • 26221 USB graphics adapter Silver:No
  • Product colour
    • USB-C Dual 4K/60Hz (single 8K/30Hz) DP Video Adapter:Black
    • 26221 USB graphics adapter Silver:Silver
  • Windows operating systems supported
    • USB-C Dual 4K/60Hz (single 8K/30Hz) DP Video Adapter:Yes
    • 26221 USB graphics adapter Silver:Windows 11
  • Width
    • USB-C Dual 4K/60Hz (single 8K/30Hz) DP Video Adapter:70 mm
    • 26221 USB graphics adapter Silver:15 mm
  • Depth
    • USB-C Dual 4K/60Hz (single 8K/30Hz) DP Video Adapter:60 mm
    • 26221 USB graphics adapter Silver:8 mm
  • Height
    • USB-C Dual 4K/60Hz (single 8K/30Hz) DP Video Adapter:15 mm
    • 26221 USB graphics adapter Silver:32 mm
  • Weight
    • USB-C Dual 4K/60Hz (single 8K/30Hz) DP Video Adapter:53 g
    • 26221 USB graphics adapter Silver:5 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of C31DUAL4K60DP, 26221
28 specifications
Performance2 differ
USB versionKnown for one2.0Unknown — not stated by the source
USB connector typeDiffersUSB Type-CUSB Type-A, USB Type-C
USB connector genderKnown for oneMaleUnknown — not stated by the source
DisplayPort outputDiffersYesNo
DisplayPorts quantityKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of displays supportedKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum resolutionKnown for one7680 x 4320 pixelsUnknown — not stated by the source
Refresh rate at maximum resolutionKnown for one30 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
USB connector form factorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceStraight
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackSilver
System requirements1 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersYesWindows 11
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Other operating systems supportedKnown for oneAndroid, ChromeOSUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers70 mm15 mm
DepthDiffers60 mm8 mm
HeightDiffers15 mm32 mm
WeightDiffers53 g5 g
USB cable lengthKnown for one0.3 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package typeKnown for oneBoxUnknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one180 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one130 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one25 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one131 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More usb graphics adapter comparisons

All usb graphics adapter comparisons