Product comparison · 2 usb graphics adapters

HP USB Graphics Adapter vs HP USB-C to HDMI Adapter

5specifications compared
4differ
1identical
8known for one product only

Key differences

Width
- USB Graphics Adapter:54 mm
- USB-C to HDMI Adapter:11 mm
Depth
- USB Graphics Adapter:84 mm
- USB-C to HDMI Adapter:25 mm
Height
- USB Graphics Adapter:18 mm
- USB-C to HDMI Adapter:150 mm
Weight
- USB Graphics Adapter:231.33 g
- USB-C to HDMI Adapter:25.4 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of NL571AT, USB-C to HDMI Adapter
13 specifications	A HP USB Graphics Adapter Model NL571AT View product	B HP USB-C to HDMI Adapter View product
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	54 mm	11 mm
DepthDiffers	84 mm	25 mm
HeightDiffers	18 mm	150 mm
WeightDiffers	231.33 g	25.4 g
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 85 °C
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	110 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	34 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	236 mm
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	84733020
Performanceidentical
CertificationKnown for one	RoHS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Input voltageKnown for one	5 V	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More usb graphics adapter comparisons

All usb graphics adapter comparisons