All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 usb graphics adapters

Conceptronic USB-C to HDMI Adapter, 4K vs Nanocable 10.16.4102-BK USB graphics adapter

Add a product
  • 20specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 9identical
  • 19known for one product only

Key differences

The Conceptronic USB-C to HDMI Adapter, 4K has 30 Hz more refresh rate at maximum resolution than the Nanocable 10.16.4102-BK USB graphics adapter (60 Hz vs 30 Hz). The Conceptronic USB-C to HDMI Adapter, 4K has 175 mm more width than the Nanocable 10.16.4102-BK USB graphics adapter (220 mm vs 45 mm). The Nanocable 10.16.4102-BK USB graphics adapter has 25 mm more depth than the Conceptronic USB-C to HDMI Adapter, 4K (45 mm vs 20 mm). Product colour: Grey on the Conceptronic USB-C to HDMI Adapter, 4K, Black on the Nanocable 10.16.4102-BK USB graphics adapter. Compliance certificates: CE, RoHS on the Conceptronic USB-C to HDMI Adapter, 4K, RoHS on the Nanocable 10.16.4102-BK USB graphics adapter.

  • Refresh rate at maximum resolution
    • 60 Hz
    • 30 Hz
  • Product colour
    • Grey
    • Black
  • Width
    • 220 mm
    • 45 mm
  • Depth
    • 20 mm
    • 45 mm
  • Height
    • 11 mm
    • 16 mm
  • USB cable length
    • 0.18 m
    • 0.15 m
  • Package width
    • 75 mm
    • 180 mm
  • Package depth
    • 20 mm
    • 16 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
39 specifications
A

Conceptronic

USB-C to HDMI Adapter, 4K

Model ABBY09G

View product
B

Nanocable

10.16.4102-BK USB graphics adapter

Model 10.16.4102-BK

View product
Performance1 differ
Refresh rate at maximum resolutionDiffers60 Hz30 Hz
USB versionKnown for one3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
HDCPKnown for oneYes
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersGreyBlack
Housing materialKnown for oneAluminium
Integrated USB cableKnown for oneYes
System requirementsidentical
Mac compatibilityKnown for oneYes
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneWindows 10, Windows 10 Education, Windows 10 Education x64, Windows 10 Enterprise, Windows 10 Enterprise x64, Windows 10 Home, Windows 10 Home x64, Windows 10 IOT Core, Windows 10 IoT Enterprise, Windows 10 Pro, Windows 10 Pro x64, Windows 10 x64, Windows 7, Windows 7 Enterprise, Windows 7 Enterpris
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneMac OS X 10.10 Yosemite, Mac OS X 10.11 El Capitan, Mac OS X 10.12 Sierra, Mac OS X 10.13 High Sierra, Mac OS X 10.14 Mojave, Mac OS X 10.15 Catalina, Mac OS X 10.15.3 Catalina, Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard, Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard, Mac OS X 10.7 Lion, Mac OS X 10.7.5 Lion, Mac OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion,
Other operating systems supportedKnown for oneAndroid
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers220 mm45 mm
DepthDiffers20 mm45 mm
HeightDiffers11 mm16 mm
WeightKnown for one19 g
USB cable lengthDiffers0.18 m0.15 m
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 45 °C
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers75 mm180 mm
Package depthDiffers20 mm16 mm
Package heightDiffers160 mm135 mm
Package weightDiffers31 g30 g
Package typeKnown for onePolybag
Packaging contentidentical
Quick installation guideKnown for oneYes
Technical details1 differ
Compliance certificatesDiffersCE, RoHSRoHS
Sustainability complianceKnown for oneYes
Logistics dataidentical
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one50 pc(s)
Master (outer) case widthKnown for one230 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for one180 mm
Master (outer) case heightKnown for one320 mm
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for one1.5 kg
Country of originKnown for oneChina

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More usb graphics adapter comparisons

All usb graphics adapter comparisons