Product comparison · 2 usb graphics adapters

CLUB3D USB 3.1 Type C to DisplayPort1.2 UHD Adapter vs Microconnect 0.2m USB C - DP

9specifications compared
4differ
5identical
8known for one product only

Key differences

Weight
- USB 3.1 Type C to DisplayPort1.2 UHD Adapter:50 g
- 0.2m USB C - DP:20 g
Package width
- USB 3.1 Type C to DisplayPort1.2 UHD Adapter:60 mm
- 0.2m USB C - DP:199 mm
Package depth
- USB 3.1 Type C to DisplayPort1.2 UHD Adapter:35 mm
- 0.2m USB C - DP:178 mm
Package height
- USB 3.1 Type C to DisplayPort1.2 UHD Adapter:182 mm
- 0.2m USB C - DP:18 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CAC-1507, 0.2m USB C - DP
17 specifications	A CLUB3D USB 3.1 Type C to DisplayPort1.2 UHD Adapter Model CAC-1507 View product	B Microconnect 0.2m USB C - DP View product
Performanceidentical
CertificationKnown for one	ROHS, FCC, and CE EMI	Unknown — not stated by the source
High Dynamic Range (HDR) supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Supported graphics resolutionsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3840 x 2160
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one	23 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	10, 150	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers	50 g	20 g
Packaging data3 differ
Package typeKnown for one	Box	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package widthDiffers	60 mm	199 mm
Package depthDiffers	35 mm	178 mm
Package heightDiffers	182 mm	18 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	32 g
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	84733020

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More usb graphics adapter comparisons

All usb graphics adapter comparisons