Product comparison · 2 usb graphics adapters

ACT USB-C multiport adapter for 1 HDMI monitor, 1x USB-C, 2x USB-A, card reader vs ACT USB-C docking station 4K, for 1 HDMI or VGA monitor, ethernet, USB hub

9specifications compared
4differ
5identical
19known for one product only

Key differences

The ACT USB-C docking station 4K, for 1 HDMI or VGA monitor, ethernet, USB hub has 0.03 m more USB cable length than the ACT USB-C multiport adapter for 1 HDMI monitor, 1x USB-C, 2x USB-A, card reader (0.15 m vs 0.12 m). Only the ACT USB-C docking station 4K, for 1 HDMI or VGA monitor, ethernet, USB hub has DisplayPort output. USB connector type: USB Type-A, USB Type-C on the ACT USB-C multiport adapter for 1 HDMI monitor, 1x USB-C, 2x USB-A, card reader, USB Type-C on the ACT USB-C docking station 4K, for 1 HDMI or VGA monitor, ethernet, USB hub. Product colour: Grey on the ACT USB-C multiport adapter for 1 HDMI monitor, 1x USB-C, 2x USB-A, card reader, Black on the ACT USB-C docking station 4K, for 1 HDMI or VGA monitor, ethernet, USB hub.

USB connector type
- USB-C multiport adapter for 1 HDMI monitor, 1x USB-C, 2x USB-A, card reader:USB Type-A, USB Type-C
- USB-C docking station 4K, for 1 HDMI or VGA monitor, ethernet, USB hub:USB Type-C
DisplayPort output
- USB-C multiport adapter for 1 HDMI monitor, 1x USB-C, 2x USB-A, card reader:No
- USB-C docking station 4K, for 1 HDMI or VGA monitor, ethernet, USB hub:Yes
Product colour
- USB-C multiport adapter for 1 HDMI monitor, 1x USB-C, 2x USB-A, card reader:Grey
- USB-C docking station 4K, for 1 HDMI or VGA monitor, ethernet, USB hub:Black
USB cable length
- USB-C multiport adapter for 1 HDMI monitor, 1x USB-C, 2x USB-A, card reader:0.12 m
- USB-C docking station 4K, for 1 HDMI or VGA monitor, ethernet, USB hub:0.15 m

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of AC7021, AC7330
28 specifications	A ACT USB-C multiport adapter for 1 HDMI monitor, 1x USB-C, 2x USB-A, card reader Model AC7021 View product	B ACT USB-C docking station 4K, for 1 HDMI or VGA monitor, ethernet, USB hub Model AC7330 View product
Performance2 differ
USB connector typeDiffers	USB Type-A, USB Type-C	USB Type-C
DisplayPort outputDiffers	No	Yes
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum resolution (HDMI)Known for one	4096 x 2160 pixels	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supported graphics resolutionsKnown for one	1920 x 1080 (HD 1080), 4096 x 2160	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB connector genderKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Male
USB connector form factorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Straight
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
USB 2.0 Type-A ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
VGA (D-Sub) outputKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
HDMI versionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.4
Refresh rate at maximum resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 Hz
USB Power Delivery (USB PD)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Grey	Black
Housing materialKnown for one	Aluminium	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Output voltageKnown for one	12.0V (2.58A), 15.0V (2.67A), 20.0V (3.0A), 5.0V (2.0A), 9.0V (2.44A)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one	125 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	160 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	25 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one	121 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB cable lengthDiffers	0.12 m	0.15 m

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More usb graphics adapter comparisons

All usb graphics adapter comparisons