Product comparison · 2 usb flash drives

Kingston Technology Exodia M vs Kingston Technology microDuo 3C

Key differences

Capacity
- Exodia M:256 GB
- microDuo 3C:128 GB
Device interface
- Exodia M:USB Type-A
- microDuo 3C:USB Type-A / USB Type-C
Form factor
- Exodia M:Slide
- microDuo 3C:Other
Product colour
- Exodia M:Black, Turquoise
- microDuo 3C:Stainless steel, Purple
Width
- Exodia M:21.8 mm
- microDuo 3C:16.6 mm
Depth
- Exodia M:67.4 mm
- microDuo 3C:29.9 mm
Height
- Exodia M:11.6 mm
- microDuo 3C:8.44 mm
Weight
- Exodia M:10 g
- microDuo 3C:5 g

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Exodia M, microDuo 3C
27 specifications	A Kingston Technology Exodia M View product	B Kingston Technology microDuo 3C View product
Performance3 differ
CapacityDiffers	256 GB	128 GB
Device interfaceDiffers	USB Type-A	USB Type-A / USB Type-C
Read speedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	200 MB/s
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Windows 11, macOS (v. 13.7.8+), Linux (v. 4.4.x+), Chrome OS	Windows 11/10, macOS (v. 12.7.6 +), Linux (v. 4.4.x +), Chrome OS
Design2 differ
Form factorDiffers	Slide	Other
Product colourDiffers	Black, Turquoise	Stainless steel, Purple
Key ringKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	21.8 mm	16.6 mm
DepthDiffers	67.4 mm	29.9 mm
HeightDiffers	11.6 mm	8.44 mm
WeightDiffers	10 g	5 g
Packaging data2 differ
Package depthDiffers	11.9 mm	9.14 mm
Package weightDiffers	20.23 g	15.05 g
Package typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Hanging box
Logistics data1 differ
Master (outer) case gross weightDiffers	591.52 g	461.91 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.