Product comparison · 2 usb flash drives

Kingston Technology DataTraveler DuoG2 vs Verbatim Antibacterial PinStripe USB 3.2 Gen 1 Drive

14specifications compared
11differ
3identical
12known for one product only

Key differences

The Verbatim Antibacterial PinStripe USB 3.2 Gen 1 Drive has 33.8 mm more width than the Kingston Technology DataTraveler DuoG2 (55 mm vs 21.2 mm). The Kingston Technology DataTraveler DuoG2 has 45 mm more depth than the Verbatim Antibacterial PinStripe USB 3.2 Gen 1 Drive (64 mm vs 19 mm). The Kingston Technology DataTraveler DuoG2 has 3.4 mm more height than the Verbatim Antibacterial PinStripe USB 3.2 Gen 1 Drive (10.4 mm vs 7 mm). Device interface: USB Type-A / USB Type-C on the Kingston Technology DataTraveler DuoG2, USB Type-A on the Verbatim Antibacterial PinStripe USB 3.2 Gen 1 Drive. Form factor: Other on the Kingston Technology DataTraveler DuoG2, Slide on the Verbatim Antibacterial PinStripe USB 3.2 Gen 1 Drive.

Device interface
- DataTraveler DuoG2:USB Type-A / USB Type-C
- Antibacterial PinStripe USB 3.2 Gen 1 Drive:USB Type-A
Form factor
- DataTraveler DuoG2:Other
- Antibacterial PinStripe USB 3.2 Gen 1 Drive:Slide
Product colour
- DataTraveler DuoG2:Black, Green
- Antibacterial PinStripe USB 3.2 Gen 1 Drive:Black
Width
- DataTraveler DuoG2:21.2 mm
- Antibacterial PinStripe USB 3.2 Gen 1 Drive:55 mm
Depth
- DataTraveler DuoG2:64 mm
- Antibacterial PinStripe USB 3.2 Gen 1 Drive:19 mm
Height
- DataTraveler DuoG2:10.4 mm
- Antibacterial PinStripe USB 3.2 Gen 1 Drive:7 mm
Weight
- DataTraveler DuoG2:10 g
- Antibacterial PinStripe USB 3.2 Gen 1 Drive:7 g
Package width
- DataTraveler DuoG2:101.6 mm
- Antibacterial PinStripe USB 3.2 Gen 1 Drive:90 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of DataTraveler DuoG2, Antibacterial PinStripe USB 3.2 Gen 1 Drive
26 specifications	A Kingston Technology DataTraveler DuoG2 View product	B Verbatim Antibacterial PinStripe USB 3.2 Gen 1 Drive View product
Performance1 differ
Capacity	256 GB	256 GB
Device interfaceDiffers	USB Type-A / USB Type-C	USB Type-A
USB version	3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)	3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Windows 11, macOS (v. 13.7.6 +), Linux (v. 4.4x +), Chrome OS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Design2 differ
Form factorDiffers	Other	Slide
Product colourDiffers	Black, Green	Black
Key ringKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	21.2 mm	55 mm
DepthDiffers	64 mm	19 mm
HeightDiffers	10.4 mm	7 mm
WeightDiffers	10 g	7 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	101.6 mm	90 mm
Package depthDiffers	11.4 mm	11 mm
Package heightDiffers	114.3 mm	135 mm
Package weightDiffers	19.08 g	16 g
Package typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Blister
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per pack	1 pc(s)	1 pc(s)
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	0 - 60 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-20 - 85 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for one	China, Taiwan	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one	25 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case widthKnown for one	120.7 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for one	171.4 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case heightKnown for one	114.3 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for one	562.61 g	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More usb flash drive comparisons

All usb flash drive comparisons