Product comparison · 2 usb flash drives

Kingston Technology 2000 16GB vs Kingston Technology 2000 64GB

Add a product
  • 38specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 33identical
  • 3known for one product only

Key differences

  • Capacity
    • 2000 16GB:16 GB
    • 2000 64GB:64 GB
  • Read speed USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
    • 2000 16GB:120 MB/s
    • 2000 64GB:135 MB/s
  • Write speed USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
    • 2000 16GB:20 MB/s
    • 2000 64GB:40 MB/s
  • Other operating systems supported
    • 2000 16GB:Android
    • 2000 64GB:ChromeOS
  • Security algorithms
    • 2000 16GB:256-bit AES
    • 2000 64GB:256-bit AES, FIPS 197

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 2000 16GB, 2000 64GB
41 specifications
A

Kingston Technology

2000 16GBView product
B

Kingston Technology

2000 64GBView product
Performance4 differ
CapacityDiffers16 GB64 GB
Read speed USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)Differs120 MB/s135 MB/s
Write speed USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)Differs20 MB/s40 MB/s
Mobile operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAndroid
Other operating systems supportedDiffersAndroidChromeOS
Designidentical
Protection featuresKnown for oneDust resistant, Water resistantUnknown — not stated by the source
Security1 differ
Fingerprint readerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Security algorithmsDiffers256-bit AES256-bit AES, FIPS 197

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More usb flash drive comparisons

All usb flash drive comparisons