Product comparison · 2 usb flash drives

Integral 32GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB 3.0 DRIVE SECURE PASSWORD 256 AES FIPS 197 CRYPTO vs Integral 32GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB 3.0 DRIVE SECURE DUAL PASSWORD ADMIN/USER 256 AES FIPS 197 CRYPTO

Add a product
  • 25specifications compared
  • 2differ
  • 23identical
  • 0known for one product only

Key differences

The Integral 32GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB 3.0 DRIVE SECURE DUAL PASSWORD ADMIN/USER 256 AES FIPS 197 CRYPTO has 27 g more package weight than the Integral 32GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB 3.0 DRIVE SECURE PASSWORD 256 AES FIPS 197 CRYPTO (54 g vs 27 g). Protection features: Water resistant on the Integral 32GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB 3.0 DRIVE SECURE PASSWORD 256 AES FIPS 197 CRYPTO, Waterproof on the Integral 32GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB 3.0 DRIVE SECURE DUAL PASSWORD ADMIN/USER 256 AES FIPS 197 CRYPTO.

  • Protection features
    • 32GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB 3.0 DRIVE SECURE PASSWORD 256 AES FIPS 197 CRYPTO:Water resistant
    • 32GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB 3.0 DRIVE SECURE DUAL PASSWORD ADMIN/USER 256 AES FIPS 197 CRYPTO:Waterproof
  • Package weight
    • 32GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB 3.0 DRIVE SECURE PASSWORD 256 AES FIPS 197 CRYPTO:27 g
    • 32GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB 3.0 DRIVE SECURE DUAL PASSWORD ADMIN/USER 256 AES FIPS 197 CRYPTO:54 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of INFD32GCRY3.0197, INFD32GCRYDL3.0197
25 specifications
Design1 differ
Protection featuresDiffersWater resistantWaterproof
Packaging data1 differ
Package weightDiffers27 g54 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More usb flash drive comparisons

All usb flash drive comparisons