Product comparison · 2 usb flash drives

Integral Neon-C 32GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) BLACK-C UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS vs Integral Neon-C 512GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) ORNG UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS

Add a product
  • 25specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 21identical
  • 0known for one product only

Key differences

  • Capacity
    • Neon-C 32GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) BLACK-C UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS:32 GB
    • Neon-C 512GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) ORNG UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS:512 GB
  • Package depth
    • Neon-C 32GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) BLACK-C UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS:53 mm
    • Neon-C 512GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) ORNG UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS:57 mm
  • Package height
    • Neon-C 32GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) BLACK-C UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS:8 mm
    • Neon-C 512GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) ORNG UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS:8.9 mm
  • Package weight
    • Neon-C 32GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) BLACK-C UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS:15 g
    • Neon-C 512GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) ORNG UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS:21 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of INFD32GBBLKC3.2, INFD512GBNEONCOR3.2
25 specifications
Performance1 differ
CapacityDiffers32 GB512 GB
Packaging data3 differ
Package depthDiffers53 mm57 mm
Package heightDiffers8 mm8.9 mm
Package weightDiffers15 g21 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More usb flash drive comparisons

All usb flash drive comparisons