Product comparison · 2 usb flash drives

Integral Neon-C 256GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) BLACK-C UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS vs Integral Neon-C 32GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) YELLOW UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS

Add a product
  • 25specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 21identical
  • 0known for one product only

Key differences

  • Capacity
    • Neon-C 256GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) BLACK-C UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS:256 GB
    • Neon-C 32GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) YELLOW UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS:32 GB
  • Package depth
    • Neon-C 256GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) BLACK-C UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS:53 mm
    • Neon-C 32GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) YELLOW UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS:57 mm
  • Package height
    • Neon-C 256GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) BLACK-C UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS:8 mm
    • Neon-C 32GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) YELLOW UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS:8.9 mm
  • Package weight
    • Neon-C 256GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) BLACK-C UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS:15 g
    • Neon-C 32GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) YELLOW UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS:21 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of INFD256GBBLKC3.2, INFD32GBNEONCYL3.2
25 specifications
Performance1 differ
CapacityDiffers256 GB32 GB
Packaging data3 differ
Package depthDiffers53 mm57 mm
Package heightDiffers8 mm8.9 mm
Package weightDiffers15 g21 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More usb flash drive comparisons

All usb flash drive comparisons