Product comparison · 2 usb flash drives

Integral 128GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) SECURE PASSWORD 256 AES FIPS 197 COURIER vs Integral 128GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) SECURE DUAL PASSWORD ADMIN/USER 256BIT AES CRYPTO-C FIPS 197

22specifications compared
6differ
16identical
2known for one product only

Key differences

The Integral 128GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) SECURE DUAL PASSWORD ADMIN/USER 256BIT AES CRYPTO-C FIPS 197 has 15 MB/s more read speed than the Integral 128GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) SECURE PASSWORD 256 AES FIPS 197 COURIER (160 MB/s vs 145 MB/s). The Integral 128GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) SECURE DUAL PASSWORD ADMIN/USER 256BIT AES CRYPTO-C FIPS 197 has 85 MB/s more write speed than the Integral 128GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) SECURE PASSWORD 256 AES FIPS 197 COURIER (130 MB/s vs 45 MB/s). The Integral 128GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) SECURE PASSWORD 256 AES FIPS 197 COURIER has 2 mm more package width than the Integral 128GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) SECURE DUAL PASSWORD ADMIN/USER 256BIT AES CRYPTO-C FIPS 197 (21 mm vs 19 mm). Form factor: Cap on the Integral 128GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) SECURE PASSWORD 256 AES FIPS 197 COURIER, Swivel on the Integral 128GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) SECURE DUAL PASSWORD ADMIN/USER 256BIT AES CRYPTO-C FIPS 197.

Read speed
- 128GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) SECURE PASSWORD 256 AES FIPS 197 COURIER:145 MB/s
- 128GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) SECURE DUAL PASSWORD ADMIN/USER 256BIT AES CRYPTO-C FIPS 197:160 MB/s
Write speed
- 128GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) SECURE PASSWORD 256 AES FIPS 197 COURIER:45 MB/s
- 128GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) SECURE DUAL PASSWORD ADMIN/USER 256BIT AES CRYPTO-C FIPS 197:130 MB/s
Form factor
- 128GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) SECURE PASSWORD 256 AES FIPS 197 COURIER:Cap
- 128GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) SECURE DUAL PASSWORD ADMIN/USER 256BIT AES CRYPTO-C FIPS 197:Swivel
Package width
- 128GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) SECURE PASSWORD 256 AES FIPS 197 COURIER:21 mm
- 128GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) SECURE DUAL PASSWORD ADMIN/USER 256BIT AES CRYPTO-C FIPS 197:19 mm
Package depth
- 128GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) SECURE PASSWORD 256 AES FIPS 197 COURIER:70 mm
- 128GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) SECURE DUAL PASSWORD ADMIN/USER 256BIT AES CRYPTO-C FIPS 197:50 mm
Package weight
- 128GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) SECURE PASSWORD 256 AES FIPS 197 COURIER:17 g
- 128GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) SECURE DUAL PASSWORD ADMIN/USER 256BIT AES CRYPTO-C FIPS 197:20 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of INFD128GCOU3.0-197, INFD128GCRDLC3-197
24 specifications	A Integral 128GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) SECURE PASSWORD 256 AES FIPS 197 COURIER Model INFD128GCOU3.0-197 View product	B Integral 128GB HARDWARE ENCRYPTED USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) SECURE DUAL PASSWORD ADMIN/USER 256BIT AES CRYPTO-C FIPS 197 Model INFD128GCRDLC3-197 View product
Performance2 differ
Read speedDiffers	145 MB/s	160 MB/s
Write speedDiffers	45 MB/s	130 MB/s
Design1 differ
Form factorDiffers	Cap	Swivel
Packaging data3 differ
Package widthDiffers	21 mm	19 mm
Package depthDiffers	70 mm	50 mm
Package weightDiffers	17 g	20 g
Operational conditionsidentical
Non-operating shockKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1000 G
Non-operating vibrationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 G

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More usb flash drive comparisons

All usb flash drive comparisons