Product comparison · 2 usb flash drives

Hama 139745 USB flash drive vs Hypertec 64GB USB3.0 EnCryptPLUS HyperDrive FIPS 197 Edition

7specifications compared
2differ
5identical
5known for one product only

Key differences

USB version
- 139745 USB flash drive:2.0
- 64GB USB3.0 EnCryptPLUS HyperDrive FIPS 197 Edition:3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Housing material
- 139745 USB flash drive:Plastic
- 64GB USB3.0 EnCryptPLUS HyperDrive FIPS 197 Edition:Metal

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 139745, HYFLUSB3464G-EP197
12 specifications	A Hama 139745 USB flash drive Model 139745 View product	B Hypertec 64GB USB3.0 EnCryptPLUS HyperDrive FIPS 197 Edition Model HYFLUSB3464G-EP197 View product
Performance1 differ
Capacity	64 GB	64 GB
Device interface	USB Type-A	USB Type-A
USB versionDiffers	2.0	3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Design1 differ
Form factor	Cap	Cap
Product colour	Black	Black
Housing materialDiffers	Plastic	Metal
Securityidentical
Password protection	Yes	Yes
Security algorithmsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	FIPS 197
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	19 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	11 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	77 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one	1 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More usb flash drive comparisons

All usb flash drive comparisons