Product comparison · 2 usb flash drives

Acer UT300 USB flash drive vs Integral Neon-C 512GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) BLUE UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS

Add a product
  • 12specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 3identical
  • 14known for one product only

Key differences

The Integral Neon-C 512GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) BLUE UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS has 480 GB more capacity than the Acer UT300 USB flash drive (512 GB vs 32 GB). The Acer UT300 USB flash drive has 43.2 mm more width than the Integral Neon-C 512GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) BLUE UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS (63.4 mm vs 20.2 mm). The Acer UT300 USB flash drive has 9.39 mm more depth than the Integral Neon-C 512GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) BLUE UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS (17.9 mm vs 8.51 mm). Device interface: USB Type-A / USB Type-C on the Acer UT300 USB flash drive, USB Type-C on the Integral Neon-C 512GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) BLUE UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS. Product colour: Grey on the Acer UT300 USB flash drive, Black on the Integral Neon-C 512GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) BLUE UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS.

  • Capacity
    • UT300 USB flash drive:32 GB
    • Neon-C 512GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) BLUE UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS:512 GB
  • Device interface
    • UT300 USB flash drive:USB Type-A / USB Type-C
    • Neon-C 512GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) BLUE UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS:USB Type-C
  • Product colour
    • UT300 USB flash drive:Grey
    • Neon-C 512GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) BLUE UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS:Black
  • Certification
    • UT300 USB flash drive:CE, FCC, RoHS, BSMI, RCM
    • Neon-C 512GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) BLUE UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS:CE, REACH, UKCA
  • Width
    • UT300 USB flash drive:63.4 mm
    • Neon-C 512GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) BLUE UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS:20.2 mm
  • Depth
    • UT300 USB flash drive:17.9 mm
    • Neon-C 512GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) BLUE UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS:8.51 mm
  • Height
    • UT300 USB flash drive:8.4 mm
    • Neon-C 512GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) BLUE UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS:56.9 mm
  • Weight
    • UT300 USB flash drive:10 g
    • Neon-C 512GB USB-C 3.2 GEN1 DRIVE (USB3.1 USB3.0) BLUE UP TO R-150 W-30 MBS:6.9 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of UT300, INFD512GBNEONCB3.2
26 specifications
Performance2 differ
CapacityDiffers32 GB512 GB
Device interfaceDiffersUSB Type-A / USB Type-CUSB Type-C
USB version3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Read speed150 MB/s150 MB/s
Write speedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 MB/s
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows, Linux and Mac
Design2 differ
Form factorCapCap
Product colourDiffersGreyBlack
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePlastic
Key ringKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
CertificationDiffersCE, FCC, RoHS, BSMI, RCMCE, REACH, UKCA
Securityidentical
PIN-secured accessKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Password protectionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers63.4 mm20.2 mm
DepthDiffers17.9 mm8.51 mm
HeightDiffers8.4 mm56.9 mm
WeightDiffers10 g6.9 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source57 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8.9 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source21 g
Package typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlister
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 60 °C0 - 70 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 80 °CUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More usb flash drive comparisons

All usb flash drive comparisons