Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Whirlpool FFT M11 8X2BS BE R vs Whirlpool FFT M11 9X3BY BE

Add a product
  • 45specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 33identical
  • 1known for one product only

Key differences

  • Rated capacity
    • FFT M11 8X2BS BE R:8 kg
    • FFT M11 9X3BY BE:9 kg
  • Condensation efficiency class
    • FFT M11 8X2BS BE R:D
    • FFT M11 9X3BY BE:B
  • Cycle time
    • FFT M11 8X2BS BE R:194 min
    • FFT M11 9X3BY BE:210 min
  • Refrigerating medium
    • FFT M11 8X2BS BE R:R290
    • FFT M11 9X3BY BE:R134a
  • Energy efficiency class
    • FFT M11 8X2BS BE R:E
    • FFT M11 9X3BY BE:C
  • Connected load
    • FFT M11 8X2BS BE R:850 W
    • FFT M11 9X3BY BE:700 W
  • Energy consumption per 100 cycles
    • FFT M11 8X2BS BE R:127 kWh
    • FFT M11 9X3BY BE:104 kWh
  • Energy consumption
    • FFT M11 8X2BS BE R:1.27 kWh
    • FFT M11 9X3BY BE:1.04 kWh

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of FFT M11 8X2BS BE R, FFT M11 9X3BY BE
46 specifications
Performance4 differ
Rated capacityDiffers8 kg9 kg
Condensation efficiency classDiffersDB
Cycle timeDiffers194 min210 min
Refrigerating mediumDiffersR290R134a
Power6 differ
Energy efficiency classDiffersEC
Connected loadDiffers850 W700 W
Energy consumption per 100 cyclesDiffers127 kWh104 kWh
Energy consumptionDiffers1.27 kWh1.04 kWh
Annual energy consumptionDiffers234 kWh194 kWh
Energy efficiency index (EEI)Differs74.756.5
Brand-specific featuresidentical
Whirlpool technologies (clothes care)Known for one6TH SENSEUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers595 mm597 mm
WeightDiffers44 kg48.5 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons