Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Whirlpool AZA HP 9950 vs Whirlpool AZB 7570

22specifications compared
6differ
16identical
6known for one product only

Key differences

Built-in display
- AZA HP 9950:Yes
- AZB 7570:No
Rated capacity
- AZA HP 9950:9 kg
- AZB 7570:7 kg
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)
- AZA HP 9950:A
- AZB 7570:B
Energy consumption
- AZA HP 9950:2.16 kWh
- AZB 7570:4 kWh
Weight
- AZA HP 9950:47 kg
- AZB 7570:38 kg
Package weight
- AZA HP 9950:49 kg
- AZB 7570:40 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of AZA HP 9950, AZB 7570
28 specifications	A Whirlpool AZA HP 9950 View product	B Whirlpool AZB 7570 View product
Design1 differ
Built-in displayDiffers	Yes	No
Performance1 differ
Rated capacityDiffers	9 kg	7 kg
Noise levelKnown for one	71 dB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum spin speedKnown for one	1400 RPM	Unknown — not stated by the source
Drying programsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Delicate/silk, Cotton
Ergonomicsidentical
Delayed start timerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Differs	A	B
Connected loadKnown for one	1050 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy consumptionDiffers	2.16 kWh	4 kWh
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	47 kg	38 kg
Packaging data1 differ
Package weightDiffers	49 kg	40 kg
Technical detailsidentical
Energy consumption (cotton cupboard dry)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.5 kWh

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons