Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Whirlpool AZA HP 8850 vs Whirlpool AZB 7570

Add a product
  • 21specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 16identical
  • 7known for one product only

Key differences

  • Rated capacity
    • AZA HP 8850:8 kg
    • AZB 7570:7 kg
  • Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)
    • AZA HP 8850:A
    • AZB 7570:B
  • Energy consumption
    • AZA HP 8850:2.32 kWh
    • AZB 7570:4 kWh
  • Weight
    • AZA HP 8850:46 kg
    • AZB 7570:38 kg
  • Package weight
    • AZA HP 8850:48 kg
    • AZB 7570:40 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of AZA HP 8850, AZB 7570
28 specifications
Designidentical
Appliance placementFreestandingFreestanding
Loading typeFront-loadFront-load
Drying systemSpinSpin
Product colourWhiteWhite
Control typeRotaryRotary
Built-in displayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Cord length1.5 m1.5 m
Performance1 differ
Rated capacityDiffers8 kg7 kg
Drying programsDelicate/silk, CottonDelicate/silk, Cotton
Adjustable spin speedYesYes
Noise levelKnown for one71 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum spin speedKnown for one1400 RPMUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Delayed start timerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Adjustable feetKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)DiffersAB
Current10 A10 A
Energy consumptionDiffers2.32 kWh4 kWh
Heat sourceElectricElectric
Connected loadKnown for one1050 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Width596 mm596 mm
Depth632 mm632 mm
Height845 mm845 mm
WeightDiffers46 kg38 kg
Packaging data1 differ
Package width640 mm640 mm
Package depth666 mm666 mm
Package height875 mm875 mm
Package weightDiffers48 kg40 kg
Technical detailsidentical
Energy consumption (cotton cupboard dry)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.5 kWh

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons