Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Whirlpool AWZ 9678 vs Whirlpool Dakota C

Add a product
  • 12specifications compared
  • 1differ
  • 11identical
  • 13known for one product only

Key differences

  • Rated capacity
    • AWZ 9678:8 kg
    • Dakota C:7 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of AWZ 9678, Dakota C
25 specifications
Designidentical
Cord lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.5 m
Performance1 differ
Rated capacityDiffers8 kg7 kg
Number of drying programsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7
Noise levelKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source67 dB
Anti-Crease functionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cycle timeKnown for one137 minUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Drum interior lightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
BuzzerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Delay start (max)Known for one12 hUnknown — not stated by the source
Child lockKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Connected loadKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2900 W
AC input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source220 - 230 V
AC input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 Hz
CurrentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 A

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons