Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Whirlpool AWZ 3308 vs Whirlpool Dakota C

Key differences

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of AWZ 3308, Dakota C
25 specifications	A Whirlpool AWZ 3308 View product	B Whirlpool Dakota C View product
Designidentical
Cord lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.5 m
Performance1 differ
Rated capacityDiffers	6 kg	7 kg
Number of drying programsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7
Noise levelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	67 dB
Anti-Crease functionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Cycle timeKnown for one	83 min	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Delayed start timerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Drum interior lightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
BuzzerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Child lockKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Connected loadKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2900 W
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	220 - 230 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 Hz
CurrentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 A
Energy consumptionDiffers	3.39 kWh	4.48 kWh
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Known for one	C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
DepthDiffers	546 mm	596 mm
WeightDiffers	31 kg	41 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.