Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Whirlpool AHIC 892 vs Whirlpool AZA 799

32specifications compared
10differ
22identical
1known for one product only

Key differences

Rated capacity
- AHIC 892:8 kg
- AZA 799:7 kg
Cycle time
- AHIC 892:164 min
- AZA 799:124 min
Noise level
- AHIC 892:69 dB
- AZA 799:71 dB
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)
- AHIC 892:A++
- AZA 799:A+
Power consumption (standby)
- AHIC 892:0.81 W
- AZA 799:1.47 W
Energy consumption
- AHIC 892:1.97 kWh
- AZA 799:2.1 kWh
Annual energy consumption
- AHIC 892:235.5 kWh
- AZA 799:258 kWh
Weight
- AHIC 892:47 kg
- AZA 799:46 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of AHIC 892, AZA 799
33 specifications	A Whirlpool AHIC 892 View product	B Whirlpool AZA 799 View product
Designidentical
Door opening angleKnown for one	140°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance4 differ
Rated capacityDiffers	8 kg	7 kg
Drying programsDiffers	Wool, Mix, Delicate/silk, Synthetics	Wool, Mix, Delicate/silk, Cotton, Synthetics
Cycle timeDiffers	164 min	124 min
Noise levelDiffers	69 dB	71 dB
Power4 differ
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Differs	A++	A+
Power consumption (standby)Differs	0.81 W	1.47 W
Energy consumptionDiffers	1.97 kWh	2.1 kWh
Annual energy consumptionDiffers	235.5 kWh	258 kWh
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	47 kg	46 kg
Packaging data1 differ
Package weightDiffers	49 kg	48 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons