Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Samsung DV203AGW tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load vs Samsung SDC18809 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load

14specifications compared
10differ
4identical
24known for one product only

Key differences

Product colour
- DV203AGW tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:Silver, White
- SDC18809 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:White
Rated capacity
- DV203AGW tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:14 kg
- SDC18809 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:8 kg
Number of drying programs
- DV203AGW tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:4
- SDC18809 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:14
AC input voltage
- DV203AGW tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:120 V
- SDC18809 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:230 V
AC input frequency
- DV203AGW tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:60 Hz
- SDC18809 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:50 Hz
Width
- DV203AGW tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:762 mm
- SDC18809 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:600 mm
Depth
- DV203AGW tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:685 mm
- SDC18809 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:600 mm
Height
- DV203AGW tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:967 mm
- SDC18809 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:850 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of DV203AGW, SDC18809
38 specifications	A Samsung DV203AGW tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load Model DV203AGW View product	B Samsung SDC18809 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load Model SDC18809 View product
Design1 differ
Appliance placement	Freestanding	Freestanding
Loading type	Front-load	Front-load
Drying systemKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Condensation
Product colourDiffers	Silver, White	White
Door hingeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Left
Control typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Buttons
Drum volumeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	120 L
Built-in displayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Display type	LED	LED
Reversible doorsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Drum materialKnown for one	Stainless steel	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance3 differ
Rated capacityDiffers	14 kg	8 kg
Number of drying programsDiffers	4	14
Drying programsDiffers	Quick	Wool, Sport, Timed, Quick, Freshen-up
Anti-Crease function	Yes	Yes
Maximum spin speedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1000 RPM
Cycle timeKnown for one	45 min	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Delayed start timerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Drum interior lightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Remaining time indicationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
LED program stage indicatorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Child lockKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	B
Connected loadKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2700 W
AC input voltageDiffers	120 V	230 V
AC input frequencyDiffers	60 Hz	50 Hz
CurrentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	11.7 A
Energy consumptionKnown for one	5.3 kWh	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	762 mm	600 mm
DepthDiffers	685 mm	600 mm
HeightDiffers	967 mm	850 mm
WeightDiffers	56.5 kg	44 kg
Door opening diameterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	33 cm
Packaging dataidentical
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	29 kg
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	669 x 695 x 890 mm
Technical detailsidentical
Energy consumption (cotton cupboard dry)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.49 kWh
StackableKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Number of cyclesKnown for one	7	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons