Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

LG RNX48TKCOB tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load vs LG RNX5010TKB tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load

Add a product
  • 47specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 40identical
  • 1known for one product only

Key differences

  • Reversible doors
    • RNX48TKCOB tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:No
    • RNX5010TKB tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:Yes
  • Rated capacity
    • RNX48TKCOB tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:8 kg
    • RNX5010TKB tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:10 kg
  • Cycle time
    • RNX48TKCOB tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:253 min
    • RNX5010TKB tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:308 min
  • Energy efficiency class
    • RNX48TKCOB tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:B
    • RNX5010TKB tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:C
  • Energy consumption per 100 cycles
    • RNX48TKCOB tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:85 kWh
    • RNX5010TKB tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:108 kWh
  • Energy consumption
    • RNX48TKCOB tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:0.85 kWh
    • RNX5010TKB tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:1.08 kWh

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of RNX48TKCOB, RNX5010TKB
48 specifications
Design1 differ
Reversible doorsDiffersNoYes
Performance3 differ
Rated capacityDiffers8 kg10 kg
Drying programsDiffersEco, Cotton, Synthetics, Wool, Sport, Mix, Download cycle, Timed, Hygiene/anti-allergy, Quick, Delicate/silkEco, Cotton, Synthetics, Wool, Sport, Mix, Download cycle, Towel, Timed, Hygiene therapy
Cycle timeDiffers253 min308 min
Power3 differ
Energy efficiency classDiffersBC
Energy consumption per 100 cyclesDiffers85 kWh108 kWh
Energy consumptionDiffers0.85 kWh1.08 kWh
Brand-specific featuresidentical
LG technologies (clothes care)Known for oneTurboDry™Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons