Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

LG DLE3170W tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load vs LG RC7066A6Z tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load

23specifications compared
11differ
12identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

Rated capacity
- DLE3170W tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:10.2 kg
- RC7066A6Z tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:7 kg
AC input voltage
- DLE3170W tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:240 V
- RC7066A6Z tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:220-230 V
Current
- DLE3170W tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:30 A
- RC7066A6Z tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:16 A
Width
- DLE3170W tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:685.8 mm
- RC7066A6Z tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:600 mm
Depth
- DLE3170W tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:755.7 mm
- RC7066A6Z tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:640 mm
Height
- DLE3170W tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:982.7 mm
- RC7066A6Z tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:850 mm
Weight
- DLE3170W tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:59 kg
- RC7066A6Z tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:44 kg
Package width
- DLE3170W tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:794.3 mm
- RC7066A6Z tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:660 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of DLE3170W, RC7066A6Z
44 specifications	A LG DLE3170W tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load Model DLE3170W View product	B LG RC7066A6Z tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load Model RC7066A6Z View product
Designidentical
Appliance placement	Freestanding	Freestanding
Loading type	Front-load	Front-load
Drying systemKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Condensation
Product colour	White	White
Door hinge	Right	Right
Control type	Buttons, Rotary	Buttons, Rotary
Built-in display	Yes	Yes
Display type	LED	LED
Drum materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Stainless steel
Reversible doorsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Drum volumeKnown for one	209.5 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance1 differ
Rated capacityDiffers	10.2 kg	7 kg
Condensation efficiency class (legacy scale)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	A
Cycle timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	119 min
Noise levelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	66 dB
Anti-Crease functionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Number of drying programsKnown for one	8	Unknown — not stated by the source
Drying programsKnown for one	Timed, Quick, Delicate/silk, Cotton	Unknown — not stated by the source
Adjustable drying levelKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of drying levelsKnown for one	5	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Delayed start timerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Delay start (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	19 h
Drum interior light	Yes	Yes
Remaining time indicationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Buzzer	Yes	Yes
Child lock	Yes	Yes
Adjustable feet	Yes	Yes
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	B
Connected loadKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2900 W
AC input voltageDiffers	240 V	220-230 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 Hz
CurrentDiffers	30 A	16 A
Energy consumptionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.24 kWh
Annual energy consumptionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	504 kWh
Heat source	Electric	Electric
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	685.8 mm	600 mm
DepthDiffers	755.7 mm	640 mm
HeightDiffers	982.7 mm	850 mm
WeightDiffers	59 kg	44 kg
Depth with door openKnown for one	129.5 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	794.3 mm	660 mm
Package depthDiffers	793.8 mm	702 mm
Package heightDiffers	1073.2 mm	910 mm
Package weightDiffers	65.3 kg	48 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons