All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Hotpoint HBT96DBSG IT vs Samsung DV80DG52B0AEEN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load

Add a product
  • 26specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 14identical
  • 17known for one product only

Key differences

The Hotpoint HBT96DBSG IT has 1 kg more rated capacity than the Samsung DV80DG52B0AEEN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load (9 kg vs 8 kg). The Hotpoint HBT96DBSG IT has 70 min more cycle time than the Samsung DV80DG52B0AEEN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load (270 min vs 200 min). The Samsung DV80DG52B0AEEN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load has 1 dB more noise level than the Hotpoint HBT96DBSG IT (64 dB vs 63 dB). Control type: Rotary, Touch on the Hotpoint HBT96DBSG IT, Rotary on the Samsung DV80DG52B0AEEN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load. Condensation efficiency class: A on the Hotpoint HBT96DBSG IT, C on the Samsung DV80DG52B0AEEN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load.

  • Control type
    • Rotary, Touch
    • Rotary
  • Rated capacity
    • 9 kg
    • 8 kg
  • Condensation efficiency class
    • A
    • C
  • Cycle time
    • 270 min
    • 200 min
  • Noise level
    • 63 dB
    • 64 dB
  • Apps supported
    • HomeWhiz
    • SmartThings
  • Energy efficiency class
    • A
    • C
  • Energy consumption per 100 cycles
    • 106 kWh
    • 95 kWh

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
43 specifications
A

Hotpoint

HBT96DBSG ITView product
B

Samsung

DV80DG52B0AEEN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load

Model DV80DG52B0AEEN

View product
Design1 differ
Appliance placementFreestandingFreestanding
Loading typeFront-loadFront-load
Drying systemHeat pumpHeat pump
Product colourWhiteWhite
Door hingeKnown for oneRight
Door colourKnown for oneBlack
Reversible doorsKnown for oneYes
Control typeDiffersRotary, TouchRotary
Built-in displayYesYes
Display typeKnown for oneLED
Drum materialStainless steelStainless steel
Drum typeKnown for oneDiamond drum
Inverter technologyKnown for oneYes
Performance5 differ
Rated capacityDiffers9 kg8 kg
Condensation efficiency classDiffersAC
Drying programsDiffersEco, Cotton, Cotton iron dry, Synthetics, Wool, Silent, Mix, Timed, Sport, Jeans/denim, Down wear/duvet, Blouse/shirt, Warm-up, Freshen-up, Bedding, Towel, Delicate/silk, Cotton ecoIron dry, Towel, Cotton eco, Delicate/silk, Mix, Hygiene/anti-allergy, Synthetics, Wool, Outdoor/sport, Bedding
Cycle timeDiffers270 min200 min
Noise emission classBB
Noise levelDiffers63 dB64 dB
Anti-Crease functionKnown for oneYes
Ergonomics1 differ
Delayed start timerYesYes
Child lockKnown for oneYes
Smartphone/tablet remote supportYesYes
Apps supportedDiffersHomeWhizSmartThings
Downloadable additional programsYesYes
Wi-Fi controlledYesYes
Near Field Communication (NFC)Known for oneNo
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency classDiffersAC
Energy efficiency scaleA to GA to G
Energy consumption per 100 cyclesDiffers106 kWh95 kWh
Energy efficiency index (EEI)Known for one55.9
Heat sourceElectricElectric
Energy consumptionKnown for one1.06 kWh
Brand-specific featuresidentical
Samsung technologies (clothes care)Known for oneSmartThings, Air Refresh, Digital Inverter Motor, OptimalDry™, Quick Dry 35', Hygiene Care, Wrinkle Prevent
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers598 mm600 mm
DepthDiffers672 mm600 mm
HeightDiffers846 mm850 mm
Weight48 kg48 kg
Depth with door openKnown for one110 cm
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one695 mm
Package depthKnown for one670 mm
Package heightKnown for one895 mm
Package weightKnown for one51 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons