Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Hoover HLP 9N5BXH-11 vs Hoover HLPS 8N3BXH-11

48specifications compared
12differ
36identical
0known for one product only

Key differences

The Hoover HLP 9N5BXH-11 has 33 L more drum volume than the Hoover HLPS 8N3BXH-11 (121 L vs 88 L). The Hoover HLP 9N5BXH-11 has 1 kg more rated capacity than the Hoover HLPS 8N3BXH-11 (9 kg vs 8 kg). The Hoover HLP 9N5BXH-11 has 90 min more cycle time than the Hoover HLPS 8N3BXH-11 (310 min vs 220 min). Energy efficiency class: A on the Hoover HLP 9N5BXH-11, C on the Hoover HLPS 8N3BXH-11.

Drum volume
- HLP 9N5BXH-11:121 L
- HLPS 8N3BXH-11:88 L
Rated capacity
- HLP 9N5BXH-11:9 kg
- HLPS 8N3BXH-11:8 kg
Cycle time
- HLP 9N5BXH-11:310 min
- HLPS 8N3BXH-11:220 min
Noise level
- HLP 9N5BXH-11:64 dB
- HLPS 8N3BXH-11:62 dB
Condensation efficiency
- HLP 9N5BXH-11:92%
- HLPS 8N3BXH-11:90%
Energy efficiency class
- HLP 9N5BXH-11:A
- HLPS 8N3BXH-11:C
Energy consumption per 100 cycles
- HLP 9N5BXH-11:79 kWh
- HLPS 8N3BXH-11:100 kWh
Energy consumption
- HLP 9N5BXH-11:0.79 kWh
- HLPS 8N3BXH-11:1 kWh

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of HLP 9N5BXH-11, HLPS 8N3BXH-11
48 specifications	A Hoover HLP 9N5BXH-11 View product	B Hoover HLPS 8N3BXH-11 View product
Design1 differ
Drum volumeDiffers	121 L	88 L
Performance4 differ
Rated capacityDiffers	9 kg	8 kg
Cycle timeDiffers	310 min	220 min
Noise levelDiffers	64 dB	62 dB
Condensation efficiencyDiffers	92%	90%
Power3 differ
Energy efficiency classDiffers	A	C
Energy consumption per 100 cyclesDiffers	79 kWh	100 kWh
Energy consumptionDiffers	0.79 kWh	1 kWh
Weight & dimensions2 differ
DepthDiffers	613 mm	524 mm
WeightDiffers	60 kg	42 kg
Packaging data2 differ
Package depthDiffers	678 mm	585 mm
Package weightDiffers	62 kg	44 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons