Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Hoover HLP 9N3BXH-11 vs Hoover HLP 9N5BXH-11

48specifications compared
9differ
39identical
0known for one product only

Key differences

The Hoover HLP 9N5BXH-11 has 10 L more drum volume than the Hoover HLP 9N3BXH-11 (121 L vs 111 L). The Hoover HLP 9N5BXH-11 has 112 min more cycle time than the Hoover HLP 9N3BXH-11 (310 min vs 198 min). The Hoover HLP 9N5BXH-11 has 2 dB more noise level than the Hoover HLP 9N3BXH-11 (64 dB vs 62 dB). Energy efficiency class: C on the Hoover HLP 9N3BXH-11, A on the Hoover HLP 9N5BXH-11.

Drum volume
- HLP 9N3BXH-11:111 L
- HLP 9N5BXH-11:121 L
Cycle time
- HLP 9N3BXH-11:198 min
- HLP 9N5BXH-11:310 min
Noise level
- HLP 9N3BXH-11:62 dB
- HLP 9N5BXH-11:64 dB
Condensation efficiency
- HLP 9N3BXH-11:88%
- HLP 9N5BXH-11:92%
Energy efficiency class
- HLP 9N3BXH-11:C
- HLP 9N5BXH-11:A
Energy consumption per 100 cycles
- HLP 9N3BXH-11:110 kWh
- HLP 9N5BXH-11:79 kWh
Energy consumption
- HLP 9N3BXH-11:1.1 kWh
- HLP 9N5BXH-11:0.79 kWh
Weight
- HLP 9N3BXH-11:45 kg
- HLP 9N5BXH-11:60 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of HLP 9N3BXH-11, HLP 9N5BXH-11
48 specifications	A Hoover HLP 9N3BXH-11 View product	B Hoover HLP 9N5BXH-11 View product
Design1 differ
Drum volumeDiffers	111 L	121 L
Performance3 differ
Cycle timeDiffers	198 min	310 min
Noise levelDiffers	62 dB	64 dB
Condensation efficiencyDiffers	88%	92%
Power3 differ
Energy efficiency classDiffers	C	A
Energy consumption per 100 cyclesDiffers	110 kWh	79 kWh
Energy consumptionDiffers	1.1 kWh	0.79 kWh
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	45 kg	60 kg
Packaging data1 differ
Package weightDiffers	47 kg	62 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons