Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Hoover HBR 9N2BX-80 vs Indesit TDI 73501

24specifications compared
16differ
8identical
22known for one product only

Key differences

The Hoover HBR 9N2BX-80 has 2 kg more rated capacity than the Indesit TDI 73501 (9 kg vs 7 kg). The Indesit TDI 73501 has 65 min more cycle time than the Hoover HBR 9N2BX-80 (270 min vs 205 min). The Indesit TDI 73501 has 2 dB more noise level than the Hoover HBR 9N2BX-80 (64 dB vs 62 dB). Only the Indesit TDI 73501 has Anti-Crease function. Door colour: Black on the Hoover HBR 9N2BX-80, Transparent, White on the Indesit TDI 73501.

Door colour
- HBR 9N2BX-80:Black
- TDI 73501:Transparent, White
Control type
- HBR 9N2BX-80:Rotary, Touch
- TDI 73501:Buttons, Rotary
Rated capacity
- HBR 9N2BX-80:9 kg
- TDI 73501:7 kg
Condensation efficiency class
- HBR 9N2BX-80:B
- TDI 73501:C
Cycle time
- HBR 9N2BX-80:205 min
- TDI 73501:270 min
Noise level
- HBR 9N2BX-80:62 dB
- TDI 73501:64 dB
Anti-Crease function
- HBR 9N2BX-80:No
- TDI 73501:Yes
Energy efficiency class
- HBR 9N2BX-80:D
- TDI 73501:E

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of HBR 9N2BX-80, TDI 73501
46 specifications	A Hoover HBR 9N2BX-80 View product	B Indesit TDI 73501 View product
Design2 differ
Door colourDiffers	Black	Transparent, White
Reversible doorsKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Control typeDiffers	Rotary, Touch	Buttons, Rotary
Display typeKnown for one	LED	Unknown — not stated by the source
Drum materialKnown for one	Galvanized	Unknown — not stated by the source
Inverter technologyKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Door hingeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Right
Built-in displayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Performance5 differ
Rated capacityDiffers	9 kg	7 kg
Condensation efficiency classDiffers	B	C
Number of drying programsKnown for one	15	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cycle timeDiffers	205 min	270 min
Noise levelDiffers	62 dB	64 dB
Anti-Crease functionDiffers	No	Yes
Refrigerating mediumKnown for one	R290	Unknown — not stated by the source
Drying programsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Auto, Baby care, Cotton, Delicate/silk, Jeans/denim, Mix, Quick, Refresh, Sport, Synthetics, Timed, Towel
Half-loadKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ergonomicsidentical
Delay start (max)Known for one	24 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Child lockKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power5 differ
Energy efficiency classDiffers	D	E
AC input voltageKnown for one	220-240 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (standby)Differs	2 W	0.5 W
Power consumption (off)Differs	0.3 W	0.5 W
Energy consumptionDiffers	1.26 kWh	1.33 kWh
Annual energy consumptionKnown for one	126 kWh	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency index (EEI)Differs	68.5	84.7
Energy consumption per 100 cyclesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	133 kWh
Brand-specific featuresidentical
Hoover technologies (clothes care)Known for one	AquaVision, Sensor Dry, WiFi, Wool Finish, hOn app	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	595 mm	59.7 mm
DepthDiffers	585 mm	54.5 mm
HeightDiffers	850 mm	84.6 mm
WeightDiffers	45 g	39.5 kg
Depth with door closedKnown for one	58.5 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	650 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	678 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	883 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	48 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for one	Turkey	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons