Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Hoover DYH 9813 NA2X vs Hoover VTV 780 NC

18specifications compared
7differ
11identical
16known for one product only

Key differences

The Hoover DYH 9813 NA2X has 8 more drying programs than the Hoover VTV 780 NC (12 vs 4). The Hoover VTV 780 NC has 2.85 kWh more energy consumption than the Hoover DYH 9813 NA2X (4.8 kWh vs 1.95 kWh). The Hoover VTV 780 NC has 344 kWh more annual energy consumption than the Hoover DYH 9813 NA2X (580 kWh vs 236 kWh). Drying system: Heat pump on the Hoover DYH 9813 NA2X, Condensation on the Hoover VTV 780 NC. Product colour: Chrome, White on the Hoover DYH 9813 NA2X, White on the Hoover VTV 780 NC.

Drying system
- DYH 9813 NA2X:Heat pump
- VTV 780 NC:Condensation
Product colour
- DYH 9813 NA2X:Chrome, White
- VTV 780 NC:White
Door hinge
- DYH 9813 NA2X:Left
- VTV 780 NC:Right
Number of drying programs
- DYH 9813 NA2X:12
- VTV 780 NC:4
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)
- DYH 9813 NA2X:A++
- VTV 780 NC:C
Energy consumption
- DYH 9813 NA2X:1.95 kWh
- VTV 780 NC:4.8 kWh
Annual energy consumption
- DYH 9813 NA2X:236 kWh
- VTV 780 NC:580 kWh

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of DYH 9813 NA2X, VTV 780 NC
34 specifications	A Hoover DYH 9813 NA2X View product	B Hoover VTV 780 NC View product
Design3 differ
Drying systemDiffers	Heat pump	Condensation
Product colourDiffers	Chrome, White	White
Door hingeDiffers	Left	Right
Drum volumeKnown for one	115 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
Drum typeKnown for one	Honeycomb	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cord lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.5 m
Performance1 differ
Condensation efficiency class (legacy scale)Known for one	B	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of drying programsDiffers	12	4
Drying programsKnown for one	Wool, Mix, Quick, Blouse/shirt	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cycle timeKnown for one	215 min	Unknown — not stated by the source
Anti-Crease functionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Delayed start timerKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Remaining time indicationKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Differs	A++	C
Energy consumptionDiffers	1.95 kWh	4.8 kWh
Annual energy consumptionDiffers	236 kWh	580 kWh
Connected loadKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2300 W
CurrentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 A
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	29 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	650 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	620 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	890 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	31 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons