Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Hoover DYC 8913 BX-S vs Hoover VHV 780 CX

Key differences

Rated capacity
- DYC 8913 BX-S:9 kg
- VHV 780 CX:8 kg
Number of drying programs
- DYC 8913 BX-S:11
- VHV 780 CX:15
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)
- DYC 8913 BX-S:B
- VHV 780 CX:C
Energy consumption
- DYC 8913 BX-S:5 kWh
- VHV 780 CX:4.5 kWh
Weight
- DYC 8913 BX-S:35 kg
- VHV 780 CX:29 kg
Package weight
- DYC 8913 BX-S:37 kg
- VHV 780 CX:31 kg
Package dimensions (WxDxH)
- DYC 8913 BX-S:650 x 620 x 900 mm
- VHV 780 CX:650 x 620 x 890 mm
Energy consumption (cotton cupboard dry)
- DYC 8913 BX-S:5.05 kWh
- VHV 780 CX:4.5 kWh

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of DYC 8913 BX-S, VHV 780 CX
28 specifications	A Hoover DYC 8913 BX-S View product	B Hoover VHV 780 CX View product
Designidentical
Drying systemKnown for one	Condensation	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance2 differ
Rated capacityDiffers	9 kg	8 kg
Number of drying programsDiffers	11	15
Ergonomicsidentical
Remaining time indicationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Differs	B	C
Energy consumptionDiffers	5 kWh	4.5 kWh
Annual energy consumptionKnown for one	281 kWh	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	35 kg	29 kg
Door opening diameterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	35 cm
Packaging data2 differ
Package weightDiffers	37 kg	31 kg
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	650 x 620 x 900 mm	650 x 620 x 890 mm
Technical details1 differ
Energy consumption (cotton cupboard dry)Differs	5.05 kWh	4.5 kWh

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.