All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Electrolux EW7H28A tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load vs Gorenje D5G2P9D tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load

Add a product
  • 32specifications compared
  • 17differ
  • 15identical
  • 22known for one product only

Key differences

The Gorenje D5G2P9D tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load has 1 kg more rated capacity than the Electrolux EW7H28A tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load (9 kg vs 8 kg). The Electrolux EW7H28A tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load has 19 min more cycle time than the Gorenje D5G2P9D tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load (229 min vs 210 min). The Gorenje D5G2P9D tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load has 1 dB more noise level than the Electrolux EW7H28A tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load (64 dB vs 63 dB). Control type: Rotary, Touch on the Electrolux EW7H28A tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load, Buttons, Rotary on the Gorenje D5G2P9D tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load. Drum material: Stainless steel on the Electrolux EW7H28A tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load, Galvanized on the Gorenje D5G2P9D tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load.

  • Control type
    • Rotary, Touch
    • Buttons, Rotary
  • Drum material
    • Stainless steel
    • Galvanized
  • Rated capacity
    • 8 kg
    • 9 kg
  • Condensation efficiency class
    • A
    • C
  • Cycle time
    • 229 min
    • 210 min
  • Noise level
    • 63 dB
    • 64 dB
  • Energy efficiency class
    • A
    • D
  • AC input voltage
    • 230 V
    • 220-240 V

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
54 specifications
A

Electrolux

EW7H28A tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load

Model EW7H28A

View product
B

Gorenje

D5G2P9D tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load

Model D5G2P9D

View product
Design2 differ
Control typeDiffersRotary, TouchButtons, Rotary
Drum materialDiffersStainless steelGalvanized
Drum typeKnown for oneRaindrop
Door opening angleKnown for one135°
Built-in condensate drainageKnown for oneYes
Door colourKnown for oneGrey
Drum volumeKnown for one118 L
Performance5 differ
Rated capacityDiffers8 kg9 kg
Condensation efficiency classDiffersAC
Number of drying programsKnown for one15
Drying programsDiffersSport, Cotton, Delicate/silk, Jeans/denim, Eco, Wool, Bedding, Outdoor/sport, Refresh, Synthetics, TimedRefresh, Quick, Pillow, Baby care, Eco, Bedding, Cotton, Hygiene+, Cupboard dry, Timed, Wool, Easy care, 30min, Sensitive, Sport, Blouse/shirt
Cycle timeDiffers229 min210 min
Noise levelDiffers63 dB64 dB
Refrigerating mediumKnown for oneR290
Moisture sensorKnown for oneYes
Condensation efficiencyKnown for one88%
Low temperatureKnown for oneYes
Adjustable drying levelKnown for oneYes
Ergonomicsidentical
Drum interior lightKnown for oneNo
Remaining time indicationKnown for oneYes
On/off buttonKnown for oneYes
Near Field Communication (NFC)Known for oneNo
Power3 differ
Energy efficiency classDiffersAD
Connected loadKnown for one700 W
AC input voltageDiffers230 V220-240 V
Energy consumption per 100 cyclesDiffers73 kWh128 kWh
AC input frequencyKnown for one50 Hz
Energy consumptionKnown for one0.73 kWh
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers596 mm595 mm
DepthDiffers636 mm590 mm
HeightDiffers850 mm845 mm
WeightDiffers47.8 kg45 kg
Door opening diameterKnown for one52 cm
Packaging data3 differ
Package widthDiffers640 mm660 mm
Package depthDiffers700 mm690 mm
Package weightDiffers49 kg47 kg
Direct drain hose includedKnown for oneYes
Technical detailsidentical
Steam functionKnown for oneNo
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneCE, VDE

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons