Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Electrolux EW6D39CBT tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load vs Sharp KD-NHL2S9GWE-EN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load

Add a product
  • 17specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 11identical
  • 46known for one product only

Key differences

The Sharp KD-NHL2S9GWE-EN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load has 3 kg more rated capacity than the Electrolux EW6D39CBT tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load (12 kg vs 9 kg). The Electrolux EW6D39CBT tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load has 2 dB more noise level than the Sharp KD-NHL2S9GWE-EN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load (66 dB vs 64 dB). The Sharp KD-NHL2S9GWE-EN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load has 351 kWh more annual energy consumption than the Electrolux EW6D39CBT tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load (351 kWh vs 0 kWh). Energy efficiency class: D on the Electrolux EW6D39CBT tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load, A on the Sharp KD-NHL2S9GWE-EN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load.

  • Rated capacity
    • EW6D39CBT tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:9 kg
    • KD-NHL2S9GWE-EN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:12 kg
  • Noise level
    • EW6D39CBT tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:66 dB
    • KD-NHL2S9GWE-EN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:64 dB
  • Energy efficiency class
    • EW6D39CBT tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:D
    • KD-NHL2S9GWE-EN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:A
  • Annual energy consumption
    • EW6D39CBT tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:0 kWh
    • KD-NHL2S9GWE-EN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:351 kWh
  • Depth
    • EW6D39CBT tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:638 mm
    • KD-NHL2S9GWE-EN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:639 mm
  • Height
    • EW6D39CBT tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:850 mm
    • KD-NHL2S9GWE-EN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:855 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of EW6D39CBT, KD-NHL2S9GWE-EN
63 specifications
Designidentical
Appliance placementFreestandingFreestanding
Loading typeFront-loadFront-load
Drying systemHeat pumpHeat pump
Product colourWhiteWhite
Door hingeKnown for oneRightUnknown — not stated by the source
Door colourKnown for oneBlackUnknown — not stated by the source
Reversible doorsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Control typeKnown for oneRotary, TouchUnknown — not stated by the source
Drum volumeKnown for one118 LUnknown — not stated by the source
Built-in displayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Display typeKnown for oneLCDUnknown — not stated by the source
Drum materialKnown for oneZincUnknown — not stated by the source
Suitable for undercounter installationKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Inverter technologyKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Performance2 differ
Rated capacityDiffers9 kg12 kg
Condensation efficiency classKnown for oneCUnknown — not stated by the source
Drying programsKnown for oneSynthetics cupboard dry, Cotton cupboard dry, Cotton extra dry, Cotton iron dry, Refresh, Sportswear, Down wear/duvet, Wool, Delicate/silk, Mix, Eco, Easy iron, BeddingUnknown — not stated by the source
Cycle timeKnown for one209 minUnknown — not stated by the source
Noise emission classKnown for oneCUnknown — not stated by the source
Noise levelDiffers66 dB64 dB
Anti-Crease functionKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Anti-Crease cycleKnown for one90 minUnknown — not stated by the source
Alternate rotationKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Adjustable drying levelKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Left-on mode durationKnown for one5 minUnknown — not stated by the source
Moisture sensorKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of drying levelsKnown for one3Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Delayed start timerYesYes
Remaining time indicationYesYes
BuzzerKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Buzzer offKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Child lockYesYes
Adjustable feetYesYes
Number of adjustable feetKnown for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
Self-cleaningKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Reverse drum operationKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
On/off buttonKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Filter cleaning indicatorYesYes
Fluff filterKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Water tank full indicatorYesYes
Wi-Fi controlledKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Near Field Communication (NFC)Known for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Drum interior lightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency classDiffersDA
Energy efficiency scaleKnown for oneA to GUnknown — not stated by the source
Connected loadKnown for one700 WUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one230 VUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input frequencyKnown for one50 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
CurrentKnown for one5 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Energy consumption per 100 cyclesKnown for one128 kWhUnknown — not stated by the source
Energy consumptionKnown for one1.99 kWhUnknown — not stated by the source
Annual energy consumptionDiffers0 kWh351 kWh
Heat sourceKnown for oneElectricUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Width596 mm596 mm
DepthDiffers638 mm639 mm
HeightDiffers850 mm855 mm
WeightKnown for one44.1 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Drying rack includedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one640 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one680 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one890 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one45.6 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for onePolandUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons