Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Electrolux EDI 97170 vs Whirlpool AWZ 3428

Add a product
  • 7specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 4identical
  • 10known for one product only

Key differences

  • Energy consumption
    • EDI 97170:3.92 kWh
    • AWZ 3428:3.95 kWh
  • Depth
    • EDI 97170:580 mm
    • AWZ 3428:546 mm
  • Height
    • EDI 97170:850 mm
    • AWZ 3428:855 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of EDI 97170, AWZ 3428
17 specifications
Designidentical
Appliance placementFreestandingFreestanding
Loading typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceFront-load
Product colourWhiteWhite
Reversible doorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Door opening angleKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source180°
Display typeKnown for oneLCDUnknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Rated capacity7 kg7 kg
Cycle timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source90 min
Ergonomicsidentical
Delayed start timerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Delay start (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source9 h
Child lockKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power1 differ
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceC
Energy consumptionDiffers3.92 kWh3.95 kWh
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Width600 mm600 mm
DepthDiffers580 mm546 mm
HeightDiffers850 mm855 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source31 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons