Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Candy GOC 760 BT vs Candy GOC 780 BT-S

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 10identical
  • 11known for one product only

Key differences

  • Rated capacity
    • GOC 760 BT:6 kg
    • GOC 780 BT-S:8 kg
  • Drying programs
    • GOC 760 BT:Quick
    • GOC 780 BT-S:Wool, Quick, Synthetics
  • Energy consumption
    • GOC 760 BT:3.36 kWh
    • GOC 780 BT-S:4.49 kWh

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of GOC 760 BT, GOC 780 BT-S
24 specifications
Designidentical
Appliance placementFreestandingFreestanding
Loading typeFront-loadFront-load
Product colourWhiteWhite
Control typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceButtons, Rotary
Built-in displayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Performance2 differ
Rated capacityDiffers6 kg8 kg
Drying programsDiffersQuickWool, Quick, Synthetics
Number of drying programsKnown for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Delayed start timerYesYes
Delay start (max)24 h24 h
Remaining time indicationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power1 differ
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)BB
Connected load2300 W2300 W
Energy consumptionDiffers3.36 kWh4.49 kWh
CurrentKnown for one10 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width600 mm600 mm
Depth600 mm600 mm
Height850 mm850 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source35 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source650 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source620 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source900 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source37 kg
Other featuresidentical
Water consumption per cycleKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source115 L

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons