Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Candy GO DC 38 G vs Whirlpool AWZ 9578

8specifications compared
3differ
5identical
10known for one product only

Key differences

Energy consumption
- GO DC 38 G:4.49 kWh
- AWZ 9578:4.48 kWh
Depth
- GO DC 38 G:600 mm
- AWZ 9578:596 mm
Height
- GO DC 38 G:850 mm
- AWZ 9578:855 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of GO DC 38 G, AWZ 9578
18 specifications	A Candy GO DC 38 G View product	B Whirlpool AWZ 9578 View product
Designidentical
Door opening angleKnown for one	150°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Number of drying programsKnown for one	12	Unknown — not stated by the source
Anti-Crease functionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cycle timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	137 min
Power1 differ
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Known for one	B	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one	230 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input frequencyKnown for one	50 - 60 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
CurrentKnown for one	10 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy consumptionDiffers	4.49 kWh	4.48 kWh
Weight & dimensions2 differ
DepthDiffers	600 mm	596 mm
HeightDiffers	850 mm	855 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	41 kg
Ergonomicsidentical
Delay start (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	12 h

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons