All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Candy GDL 8N2G-S vs Dreame L9 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load

Add a product
  • 23specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 10identical
  • 31known for one product only

Key differences

The Dreame L9 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load has 1 kg more rated capacity than the Candy GDL 8N2G-S (9 kg vs 8 kg). The Candy GDL 8N2G-S has 9 more drying programs than the Dreame L9 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load (16 vs 7). The Candy GDL 8N2G-S has 150 min more cycle time than the Dreame L9 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load (180 min vs 30 min). Only the Dreame L9 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load has suitable for undercounter installation. Only the Dreame L9 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load has inverter technology.

  • Product colour
    • White
    • Graphite
  • Door colour
    • Grey
    • Graphite
  • Control type
    • Rotary, Buttons
    • Rotary, Touch
  • Suitable for undercounter installation
    • No
    • Yes
  • Inverter technology
    • No
    • Yes
  • Rated capacity
    • 8 kg
    • 9 kg
  • Number of drying programs
    • 16
    • 7
  • Cycle time
    • 180 min
    • 30 min

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
54 specifications
A

Candy

GDL 8N2G-SView product
B

Dreame

L9 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load

Model L9

View product
Design5 differ
Appliance placementFreestandingFreestanding
Loading typeFront-loadFront-load
Drying systemHeat pumpHeat pump
Product colourDiffersWhiteGraphite
Door colourDiffersGreyGraphite
Reversible doorsKnown for oneNo
Control typeDiffersRotary, ButtonsRotary, Touch
Drum volumeKnown for one116 L
Built-in displayYesYes
Tub materialKnown for oneStainless steel
Suitable for undercounter installationDiffersNoYes
Inverter technologyDiffersNoYes
Display typeKnown for oneTFT
Performance4 differ
Rated capacityDiffers8 kg9 kg
Condensation efficiency classKnown for oneB
Number of drying programsDiffers167
Drying programsDiffersEco, Wool, Shirts, Synthetics, Colour, XL Sheets, Cotton, Jeans/denim, Quick 14min, Quick, Daily, Mix, Sport30min, Iron dry, Ready to wear, Cupboard dry, Steam, Wool, Night
Cycle timeDiffers180 min30 min
Noise emission classKnown for oneB
Noise levelKnown for one62 dB
Anti-Crease functionYesYes
Alternate rotationKnown for oneYes
Condensation efficiencyKnown for one88%
Adjustable drying levelKnown for oneYes
Moisture sensorKnown for oneYes
Number of drying levelsKnown for one3
Extra dryKnown for oneYes
Ergonomics1 differ
Delayed start timerKnown for oneYes
Delay start (max)Known for one24 h
Drum interior lightKnown for oneNo
Remaining time indicationYesYes
LED program stage indicatorKnown for oneNo
Child lockKnown for oneYes
Wi-Fi controlledDiffersNoYes
Filter cleaning indicatorKnown for oneYes
Smartphone/tablet remote supportKnown for oneYes
Water tank full indicatorKnown for oneYes
Downloadable additional programsKnown for oneYes
Power1 differ
Energy efficiency classDiffersDB
Energy efficiency scaleA to GA to G
Energy consumption per 100 cyclesKnown for one116 kWh
Energy consumptionKnown for one1.16 kWh
Heat sourceElectricElectric
AC input voltageKnown for one220 – 240
AC input frequencyKnown for one50 Hz
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Width600 mm600 mm
DepthDiffers590 mm695 mm
Height850 mm850 mm
WeightDiffers42 kg53 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one665 mm
Package depthKnown for one660 mm
Package heightKnown for one890 mm
Package weightKnown for one44 kg
Other featuresidentical
Warranty periodKnown for one2 year(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons