Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Candy GD 10N2BC-S vs Hoover HGD 10N1BC-17

29specifications compared
10differ
19identical
17known for one product only

Key differences

The Hoover HGD 10N1BC-17 has 35 min more cycle time than the Candy GD 10N2BC-S (260 min vs 225 min). The Hoover HGD 10N1BC-17 has 0.29 kWh more energy consumption than the Candy GD 10N2BC-S (1.66 kWh vs 1.37 kWh). The Candy GD 10N2BC-S has 20 mm more package depth than the Hoover HGD 10N1BC-17 (650 mm vs 630 mm). Drying system: Heat pump on the Candy GD 10N2BC-S, Condensation on the Hoover HGD 10N1BC-17. Control type: Rotary, Touch on the Candy GD 10N2BC-S, Buttons on the Hoover HGD 10N1BC-17.

Drying system
- GD 10N2BC-S:Heat pump
- HGD 10N1BC-17:Condensation
Control type
- GD 10N2BC-S:Rotary, Touch
- HGD 10N1BC-17:Buttons
Drum material
- GD 10N2BC-S:Stainless steel
- HGD 10N1BC-17:Galvanized
Cycle time
- GD 10N2BC-S:225 min
- HGD 10N1BC-17:260 min
Energy efficiency class
- GD 10N2BC-S:D
- HGD 10N1BC-17:E
AC input voltage
- GD 10N2BC-S:220-240 V
- HGD 10N1BC-17:220 - 240 V
Energy consumption
- GD 10N2BC-S:1.37 kWh
- HGD 10N1BC-17:1.66 kWh
Package depth
- GD 10N2BC-S:650 mm
- HGD 10N1BC-17:630 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of GD 10N2BC-S, HGD 10N1BC-17
46 specifications	A Candy GD 10N2BC-S View product	B Hoover HGD 10N1BC-17 View product
Design3 differ
Drying systemDiffers	Heat pump	Condensation
Custom panel-readyKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Door hingeKnown for one	Right	Unknown — not stated by the source
Control typeDiffers	Rotary, Touch	Buttons
Drum materialDiffers	Stainless steel	Galvanized
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	White
Display typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LED
Performance2 differ
Drying programsDiffers	Eco, Wool, Synthetics, Quick, Sport, Cotton	Easy iron
Cycle timeDiffers	225 min	260 min
Number of drying levelsKnown for one	4	Unknown — not stated by the source
Anti-Crease functionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ergonomicsidentical
Drum interior lightKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Water tank full indicatorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
BluetoothKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Wi-Fi controlledKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Near Field Communication (NFC)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Power3 differ
Energy efficiency classDiffers	D	E
AC input voltageDiffers	220-240 V	220 - 240 V
Energy consumption per 100 cyclesKnown for one	137 kWh	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy consumptionDiffers	1.37 kWh	1.66 kWh
Heat sourceKnown for one	Electric	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power plug typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Type E/F
Brand-specific featuresidentical
Candy technologies (clothes care)Known for one	Memory Function	Unknown — not stated by the source
Hoover technologies (clothes care)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Easy Iron
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for one	43.9 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data2 differ
Package depthDiffers	650 mm	630 mm
Package weightDiffers	45.4 kg	44.5 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons