Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Candy GCC 770 NBT vs Candy GCH 981 NA2T

24specifications compared
10differ
14identical
5known for one product only

Key differences

Drying system
- GCC 770 NBT:Condensation
- GCH 981 NA2T:Heat pump
Rated capacity
- GCC 770 NBT:7 kg
- GCH 981 NA2T:8 kg
Condensation efficiency class (legacy scale)
- GCC 770 NBT:C
- GCH 981 NA2T:B
Cycle time
- GCC 770 NBT:135 min
- GCH 981 NA2T:172 min
Noise level
- GCC 770 NBT:69 dB
- GCH 981 NA2T:67 dB
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)
- GCC 770 NBT:B
- GCH 981 NA2T:A++
Annual energy consumption
- GCC 770 NBT:504 kWh
- GCH 981 NA2T:236 kWh
Width
- GCC 770 NBT:600 mm
- GCH 981 NA2T:595 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of GCC 770 NBT, GCH 981 NA2T
29 specifications	A Candy GCC 770 NBT View product	B Candy GCH 981 NA2T View product
Design1 differ
Drying systemDiffers	Condensation	Heat pump
Drum typeKnown for one	Honeycomb	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance5 differ
Rated capacityDiffers	7 kg	8 kg
Condensation efficiency class (legacy scale)Differs	C	B
Drying programsDiffers	Wool, Mix, Timed, Blouse/shirt	Wool, Mix, Blouse/shirt
Cycle timeDiffers	135 min	172 min
Noise levelDiffers	69 dB	67 dB
Number of drying programsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	19
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Differs	B	A++
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	0.8 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy consumptionKnown for one	4.2 kWh	Unknown — not stated by the source
Annual energy consumptionDiffers	504 kWh	236 kWh
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	220-240 V
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers	600 mm	595 mm
DepthDiffers	600 mm	610 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons