Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Candy EVOC 981 AT vs Candy GOC 970 AT

21specifications compared
6differ
15identical
7known for one product only

Key differences

Door opening angle
- EVOC 981 AT:180°
- GOC 970 AT:150°
Rated capacity
- EVOC 981 AT:8 kg
- GOC 970 AT:7 kg
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)
- EVOC 981 AT:A
- GOC 970 AT:A-30%
Energy consumption
- EVOC 981 AT:2.31 kWh
- GOC 970 AT:2.36 kWh
Annual energy consumption
- EVOC 981 AT:149 kWh
- GOC 970 AT:169 kWh

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of EVOC 981 AT, GOC 970 AT
28 specifications	A Candy EVOC 981 AT View product	B Candy GOC 970 AT View product
Design1 differ
Drying systemKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Condensation
Drum volumeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	115 L
Door opening angleDiffers	180°	150°
Performance2 differ
Rated capacityDiffers	8 kg	7 kg
Drying programsDiffers	Auto, Wool, Quick, Delicate/silk, Cotton	Wool, Mix, Quick, Freshen-up
Ergonomicsidentical
Remaining time indicationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
LED program stage indicatorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power3 differ
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Differs	A	A-30%
Energy consumptionDiffers	2.31 kWh	2.36 kWh
Annual energy consumptionDiffers	149 kWh	169 kWh
Heat sourceKnown for one	Electric	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Energy consumption washing per cycleKnown for one	2.31 kWh	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Water reservoir locationKnown for one	Top	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons