Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Candy CSTW 539 vs Candy GO DC 38 G

13specifications compared
7differ
6identical
5known for one product only

Key differences

Loading type
- CSTW 539:Top-load
- GO DC 38 G:Front-load
Rated capacity
- CSTW 539:5 kg
- GO DC 38 G:8 kg
Number of drying programs
- CSTW 539:5
- GO DC 38 G:12
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)
- CSTW 539:C
- GO DC 38 G:B
AC input voltage
- CSTW 539:220 - 240 V
- GO DC 38 G:230 V
Energy consumption
- CSTW 539:3.2 kWh
- GO DC 38 G:4.49 kWh
Width
- CSTW 539:400 mm
- GO DC 38 G:600 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CSTW 539, GO DC 38 G
18 specifications	A Candy CSTW 539 View product	B Candy GO DC 38 G View product
Design1 differ
Loading typeDiffers	Top-load	Front-load
Door opening angleKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	150°
Performance2 differ
Rated capacityDiffers	5 kg	8 kg
Number of drying programsDiffers	5	12
Ergonomicsidentical
Delayed start timerKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Delay start (max)Known for one	9 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
LED program stage indicatorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Differs	C	B
AC input voltageDiffers	220 - 240 V	230 V
Energy consumptionDiffers	3.2 kWh	4.49 kWh
CurrentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 A
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthDiffers	400 mm	600 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons