Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Candy BQS 8N3BGX-S vs Sharp KD-NHA8S6GW1D-EN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load

Add a product
  • 17specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 11identical
  • 28known for one product only

Key differences

The Sharp KD-NHA8S6GW1D-EN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load has 1 mm more width than the Candy BQS 8N3BGX-S (596 mm vs 595 mm). The Sharp KD-NHA8S6GW1D-EN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load has 39 mm more depth than the Candy BQS 8N3BGX-S (563 mm vs 524 mm). The Candy BQS 8N3BGX-S has 5 mm more height than the Sharp KD-NHA8S6GW1D-EN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load (850 mm vs 845 mm). Product colour: Grey on the Candy BQS 8N3BGX-S, White on the Sharp KD-NHA8S6GW1D-EN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load. Door colour: Black on the Candy BQS 8N3BGX-S, White on the Sharp KD-NHA8S6GW1D-EN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load.

  • Product colour
    • BQS 8N3BGX-S:Grey
    • KD-NHA8S6GW1D-EN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:White
  • Door colour
    • BQS 8N3BGX-S:Black
    • KD-NHA8S6GW1D-EN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:White
  • Energy efficiency class
    • BQS 8N3BGX-S:C
    • KD-NHA8S6GW1D-EN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:A
  • Width
    • BQS 8N3BGX-S:595 mm
    • KD-NHA8S6GW1D-EN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:596 mm
  • Depth
    • BQS 8N3BGX-S:524 mm
    • KD-NHA8S6GW1D-EN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:563 mm
  • Height
    • BQS 8N3BGX-S:850 mm
    • KD-NHA8S6GW1D-EN tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:845 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of BQS 8N3BGX-S, KD-NHA8S6GW1D-EN
45 specifications
Design2 differ
Product colourDiffersGreyWhite
Colour nameKnown for onePolar Night GreyUnknown — not stated by the source
Custom panel-readyKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Door hingeKnown for oneRightUnknown — not stated by the source
Door colourDiffersBlackWhite
Control typeKnown for oneRotary, TouchUnknown — not stated by the source
Drum volumeKnown for one88 LUnknown — not stated by the source
Built-in displayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Drum materialKnown for oneStainless steelUnknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Condensation efficiency classKnown for oneBUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of drying programsKnown for one16Unknown — not stated by the source
Drying programsKnown for oneEco, Steam, Synthetics, MixUnknown — not stated by the source
Cycle timeKnown for one220 minUnknown — not stated by the source
Noise emission classKnown for oneBUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Apps supportedKnown for onehOnUnknown — not stated by the source
BluetoothKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Wi-Fi controlledKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Child lockKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Adjustable feetKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power1 differ
Energy efficiency classDiffersCA
Energy efficiency scaleKnown for oneA to GUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one220-240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Energy consumption per 100 cyclesKnown for one101 kWhUnknown — not stated by the source
Energy consumptionKnown for one1.01 kWhUnknown — not stated by the source
Heat sourceKnown for oneElectricUnknown — not stated by the source
Annual energy consumptionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source220 kWh
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers595 mm596 mm
DepthDiffers524 mm563 mm
HeightDiffers850 mm845 mm
WeightKnown for one42 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one655 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one585 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one885 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one44 kgUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons