All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Blomberg LTA19321NW tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load vs Samsung DV80DG52B0TEEG tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load

Add a product
  • 31specifications compared
  • 17differ
  • 14identical
  • 23known for one product only

Key differences

The Blomberg LTA19321NW tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load has 1 kg more rated capacity than the Samsung DV80DG52B0TEEG tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load (9 kg vs 8 kg). The Blomberg LTA19321NW tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load has 1 more drying programs than the Samsung DV80DG52B0TEEG tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load (15 vs 14). The Samsung DV80DG52B0TEEG tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load has 5 min more cycle time than the Blomberg LTA19321NW tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load (200 min vs 195 min). Only the Samsung DV80DG52B0TEEG tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load has Wi-Fi controlled. Door colour: Black on the Blomberg LTA19321NW tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load, White on the Samsung DV80DG52B0TEEG tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load.

  • Door colour
    • Black
    • White
  • Rated capacity
    • 9 kg
    • 8 kg
  • Condensation efficiency class
    • B
    • C
  • Number of drying programs
    • 15
    • 14
  • Cycle time
    • 195 min
    • 200 min
  • Wi-Fi controlled
    • No
    • Yes
  • Energy consumption per 100 cycles
    • 184 kWh
    • 95 kWh
  • Energy consumption
    • 1.84 kWh
    • 0.95 kWh

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
54 specifications
A

Blomberg

LTA19321NW tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load

Model LTA19321NW

View product
B

Samsung

DV80DG52B0TEEG tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load

Model DV80DG52B0TEEG

View product
Design1 differ
Custom panel-readyKnown for oneNo
Door colourDiffersBlackWhite
Inverter technologyKnown for oneNo
Reversible doorsKnown for oneYes
Drum volumeKnown for one127 L
Drum typeKnown for oneAquawave
Performance5 differ
Rated capacityDiffers9 kg8 kg
Condensation efficiency classDiffersBC
Number of drying programsDiffers1514
Drying programsDiffersCotton, Cotton eco, Outdoor/sport, Towel, Freshen-up, Timed, Gentle care, Bedding, Down wear/duvet, Jeans/denim, Shirts, Hygienic drying, Xpress super shortQuick, Cotton eco, Easy care, Iron dry, Towel, Pillow, Blanket, Refresh, Synthetics, Mix, Download cycle
Cycle timeDiffers195 min200 min
Anti-Crease functionKnown for oneYes
Ergonomics1 differ
Drum interior lightKnown for oneYes
Remaining time indicationKnown for oneYes
Child lockKnown for oneYes
Adjustable feetKnown for oneYes
Filter cleaning indicatorKnown for oneYes
Apps supportedKnown for oneSmartThings
Wi-Fi controlledDiffersNoYes
Delayed start timerKnown for oneYes
Self-cleaningKnown for oneNo
Near Field Communication (NFC)Known for oneNo
Power2 differ
Connected loadKnown for one1200 W
AC input voltageKnown for one220 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one50 Hz
CurrentKnown for one5 A
Energy consumption per 100 cyclesDiffers184 kWh95 kWh
Energy consumptionDiffers1.84 kWh0.95 kWh
Annual energy consumptionKnown for one184 kWh
Brand-specific featuresidentical
Samsung technologies (clothes care)Known for oneAir Refresh
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers598 mm600 mm
DepthDiffers673 mm600 mm
HeightDiffers846 mm850 mm
WeightDiffers45 kg48 kg
Depth with door openKnown for one110 cm
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers650 mm670 mm
Package depthDiffers690 mm695 mm
Package heightDiffers885 mm895 mm
Package weightDiffers46 kg51 kg
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for oneTurkey

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons