All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Blomberg LTA19321NW tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load vs LG RNX5010TKC tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load

Add a product
  • 31specifications compared
  • 18differ
  • 13identical
  • 24known for one product only

Key differences

The Blomberg LTA19321NW tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load has 5 L more drum volume than the LG RNX5010TKC tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load (127 L vs 122 L). The LG RNX5010TKC tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load has 1 kg more rated capacity than the Blomberg LTA19321NW tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load (10 kg vs 9 kg). The LG RNX5010TKC tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load has 113 min more cycle time than the Blomberg LTA19321NW tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load (308 min vs 195 min). Only the LG RNX5010TKC tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load has Wi-Fi controlled. Product colour: White on the Blomberg LTA19321NW tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load, White, Black on the LG RNX5010TKC tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load.

  • Product colour
    • White
    • White, Black
  • Control type
    • Rotary, Touch
    • Touch, Rotary
  • Drum volume
    • 127 L
    • 122 L
  • Rated capacity
    • 9 kg
    • 10 kg
  • Cycle time
    • 195 min
    • 308 min
  • Noise level
    • 64 dB
    • 62 dB
  • Wi-Fi controlled
    • No
    • Yes
  • Energy consumption per 100 cycles
    • 184 kWh
    • 108 kWh

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
55 specifications
A

Blomberg

LTA19321NW tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load

Model LTA19321NW

View product
B

LG

RNX5010TKC tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load

Model RNX5010TKC

View product
Design3 differ
Product colourDiffersWhiteWhite, Black
Control typeDiffersRotary, TouchTouch, Rotary
Drum volumeDiffers127 L122 L
Tub materialKnown for oneStainless steel
Suitable for undercounter installationKnown for oneNo
Door hingeKnown for oneRight
Display typeKnown for oneLED
Drum typeKnown for oneAquawave
Cord lengthKnown for one1.5 m
Performance4 differ
Rated capacityDiffers9 kg10 kg
Drying programsDiffersCotton, Cotton eco, Outdoor/sport, Towel, Freshen-up, Timed, Gentle care, Bedding, Down wear/duvet, Jeans/denim, Shirts, Hygienic drying, Xpress super shortEco, Cotton, Synthetics, Wool, Sport, Mix, Download cycle, Towel, Timed, Hygiene therapy
Cycle timeDiffers195 min308 min
Noise levelDiffers64 dB62 dB
Anti-Crease functionKnown for oneYes
Alternate rotationKnown for oneNo
Refrigerating mediumKnown for oneR290
Refrigerating medium weightKnown for one145 g
Condensation efficiencyKnown for one91%
Number of drying programsKnown for one15
Ergonomics1 differ
Delay start (max)Known for one19 h
Delay start (min)Known for one3 h
Drum interior lightKnown for oneYes
Remaining time indicationKnown for oneYes
LED program stage indicatorKnown for oneNo
Child lockKnown for oneYes
Apps supportedKnown for oneLG ThinQ
Downloadable additional programsKnown for oneYes
Wi-Fi controlledDiffersNoYes
Self-cleaningKnown for oneNo
Power2 differ
Energy consumption per 100 cyclesDiffers184 kWh108 kWh
Energy consumptionDiffers1.84 kWh1.08 kWh
Annual energy consumptionKnown for one184 kWh
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers598 mm600 mm
DepthDiffers673 mm660 mm
HeightDiffers846 mm850 mm
WeightDiffers45 kg53 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers650 mm660 mm
Package depthDiffers690 mm702 mm
Package heightDiffers885 mm890 mm
Package weightDiffers46 kg56 kg
Other featuresidentical
Warranty periodKnown for one2 year(s)
Country of originKnown for oneTurkey

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons